Structure space of model proteins: A principal component analysis

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 118, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 4277-4284

  Yahyanejad, Mehdi ^a   Kardar, Mehran ^a   Tang, Chao ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRONIC DENSITY OF STATES; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MARKOV PROCESSES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBES; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

FOURIER ANALYSIS; FOURIER EIGENVECTORS; GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION; STRUCTURE SPACE;

PROTEINS;

EID: 0037338289     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1541611     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A. V. Finkelstein and O. B. Ptitsyn, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 50, 171 (1987).
2. C. Chothia, Nature (London) 357, 543 (1992).
3. S. E. Brenner, C. Chothia, and T. J. P. Hubbard, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 369 (1997).
4. C. A. Orengo, D. T. Jones, and J. M. Thornton, Nature (London) 372, 631 (1994).
5. Z. X. Wang, Proteins 26, 186 (1996).
6. S. Govindarajan, R. Recabarren, and R. A. Goldstein, Proteins 35, 408 (1999).
7. C. J. Camacho and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2505 (1993).
8. K. Yue and K. A. Dill, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 146 (1995).
9. S. Govindarajan and R. A. Goldstein, Biopolymers 36, 43 (1995).
10. H. Li, R. Helling, C. Tang, and N. S. Wingreen, Science 273, 666 (1996).
11. S. Govindarajan and R. A. Goldstein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3341 (1996).
12. H. Li, C. Tang, and N. S. Wingreen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 4987 (1998).
13. N. E. G. Buchler and R. A. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2533 (2000).
14. R. Helling, H. Li, J. Miller, R. Mélin, N. Wingreen, C. Zeng, and C. Tang, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 19, 157 (2001).
15. H. Cejtin, J. Edler, A. Gottlieb, R. Helling, H. Li, J. Philbin, N. Wingreen, and C. Tang, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 352 (2002).
16. J. Miller, C. Zeng, N. S. Wingreen, and C. Tang, Proteins 47, 506 (2002).
17. R. Mélin, H. Li, N. Wingreen, and C. Tang, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 1252 (1999).
18. T. Wang, J. Miller, N. Wingreen, C. Tang, and K. Dill, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8329 (2000).
19. A. V. Finkelstein, A. M. Gutin, and A. Y. Badretdinov, FEBS Lett. 325, 23 (1993).
20. A. V. Finkelstein, A. Y. Badretdinov, and A. M. Gutin, Proteins 23, 142 (1995).
21. S. Govindarajan and R. A. Goldstein, Biopolymers 42, 427 (1997).
22. On a bipartite lattice, every lattice point is either "black" or "white" as on a chessboard. All the nearest neighboring points of a black point are white, and vice versa. Both the two-dimensional square lattice and the three-dimensional cubic lattice are bipartite. The constraint Eq. (3) holds for any compact structures on a bipartite lattice with even number of core sites. Although this constraint is lattice-specific and will introduce a zero eigen-value, we found that the overall distribution of the eigenvalues, in particular their overall dependence on the Fourier modes q, is not sensitive to the constraint.
23. C. T. Shih, Z. Y. Su, J. F. Gwan, B. L. Hao, C. H. Hsieh, and H. C. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 386 (2000).
24. i> = 16/36. So we have x = y = -10/1377 and z = 360/1377. It is then easy to see than the 34 nonzero eigenvalues re 360/1377.
25. N(s).