Integrating models for regional development decisions: A policy perspective

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-53

  Dinc, Mustafa ^a   Haynes, Kingsley E ^b   Tarimcilar, Murat ^c  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL POLICY; SHIFT-SHARE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037336275     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001680200093     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ali AI, Lerme CS (1990) Determination of comparative advantage for the economy of states in the US. The University of Massachusetts, (Mimeograph)
2. Ali AI, Lerme CS, Nakosteen RA (1993) Assessment of intergovernmental revenue transfers. Socio-economic Planning Sciences 27(2):109-118
3. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9):1078-1092
4. Bartik TJ (1994) Better evaluation is needed for economic development programs to thrive. Economic Development Quarterly 8(2):99-106
5. Brucker S, Hastings S, Latham III, W (1987) Regional input-output analysis: comparison of five ready-made model systems. Review of Regional Studies 17(2)
6. Byrnes PE, Storbeck JS (1996) Efficiency gains from regionalization: Economic development in Chine revisited. Submitted for publication to Socio-economic Planning Sciences
7. Chang P-L, Hwang S-N, Cheng W-Y (1995) Using data envelopment analysis to measure the achievement and change of regional development in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management (43):49-66
8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Li S (1989) Using DEA to evaluate relative efficiencies in the economic performance of Chinese cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 23(6):325-344
9. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds) (1994) Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
10. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes EL (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6):429-444
11. Dinc M, Haynes K, Anderson W (1998) Productive changes in Canadian manufacturing: A mutlifactor/shift-share approach. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 21(3):385-413
12. Dinc M, Haynes KE (1999) Sources of regional inefficiency: An integrated shift-share, data envelopment analysis and input-output. The Annals of Regional Science 33:1-20
13. Dunn ES (1960) A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 6:97-112
14. Farrel MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120(3):253-290
15. Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt S (eds) (1993) The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, London
16. Forman EH, Gass SI (2001) The analytic hierarchy process - an exposition. Operations Research, Jul/Aug
17. Gerking S (1994) Measuring productivity growth in U.S. regions: A survey. International Regional Science Review 16(1-2):155-185
18. Golany B, Roll Y (1989) An application procedure for DEA. Omega 17(3):237-250
19. Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harken PT (eds) (1989) The analytic hierarchy process: Application and studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
20. Haynes KE, Dinc M (1997) Productivity change in manufacturing regions: A multifactor/shift-share approach. Growth and Change 28(Spring):150-170
21. Haynes KE, Dinc M, Paelinck JHP (1997) Identifying sources of regional productivity change in manufacturing: Alternative productivity measurement approach in a shift-share framework. Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association Annual Meeting in Rome, Italy August 27-29
22. Haynes KE, Stough RR, Shroff HFE (1990) New methodology in context: Data envelopment analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 14(2):85-88
23. Hewings GD (1985) Regional input-output analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA
24. Ido M, Saaty TL (2000) On the relativity of relative measures - Accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, Feb 15
25. IMPLAN (1993) USDA forest service and minnesota IMPLAN group. Lake Elmo, MN
26. Isard W, Azis IJ, Drennan MP, Miller RE, Saltzman S, Thorbecke E (1998) Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Ashgate Publishing, Brookfield, VT
27. Isserman AM (1994) State economic development policy and practice in the United States: A survey article. International Regional Science Review 16(1&2):49-100
28. Kendrick JW (1973) Postwar productivity trends in the United States, 1948-1969. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York
29. Kendrick JW (1983) Interindustry differences in productivity growth. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C.
30. Kendrick JW (1984) Improving company productivity. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
31. Krugman P (1991) The age of diminished expectations. The MIT Press, Cambridge
32. Mayes D, Harris C, Lansbury M (eds) (1994) Inefficiency in industry. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London
33. Miller RE, Polenske KR, Rose AZ (eds) (1989) Frontiers of input-output analysis. Oxford University Press, New York
34. Miller RE, Blair PD (1985) Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
35. Otto DM, Johnson TG (eds) (1993) Microcomputer-based input-output modeling. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
36. Rigby DL, Anderson WP (1993) Employment change, growth and productivity in Canadian manufacturing: an extension and application of shift-share analysis. Canadian Journal of Regional Science XVI(1):69-88
37. Rivlin AM (1992) Reviewing the American dream. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
38. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York
39. Saaty TL (1982) Decision making for leaders. Lifetime Learning Publications, CA
40. Saaty TL, Alexander JM (1981) Thinking with models. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England
41. Saaty TL (1989) Decision making, scaling, and number crunching. Decision Sciences 20(2): Spring
42. Sarafoglou N, Haynes KE (1990) Regional efficiencies of building sector research in Sweden: An introduction. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 14(2):117-32
43. Seiford LM, Thrall RM (1990) Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. Journal of Econometrics 46(1-2):7-38
44. Seiford LM, Chapter I (1994) A DEA bibliography. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds) Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
45. Seiford LM (1996) Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). The Journal of Productivity Analysis 7(2-3):99-137
46. Shroff HFE, Gulledge TR, Haynes KE, O'Neil MK (1998) Citing efficeincy of long-term health care facilities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 12(1):25-43
47. Wasil E, Golden B (1989) The categorized review of AHP applications. In: Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (eds) The analytic hierarchy process: Applications and studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
48. Zahedi F (1986) The analytic hierarchy process - A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 16:96-108