Danish research-active clinical nurses overcome barriers in research utilization

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-65

  Adamsen, Lis ^a,b   Larsen, Kristian ^a   Bjerregaard, Lene ^a   Madsen, Jan K ^a  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b Mental Health Services CPH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Barriers; Clinical nurse; Research active; Research utilization; Semi structured interviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENMARK; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; SOCIOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENMARK; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0037335145     PISSN: 02839318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Pedersen JE. Udfordringer i sygehusvæsenet: betænkning fra Sygehuskommissionen (Challenges in the hospital sector: recommendations from the Hospital Commission). 1997, Sundhedsministeriet (The Danish Ministry of Health), Copenhagen.
2. Weiss CH. The many findings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 1979; 39: 426-31.
3. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 1983, 3rd edn. Free Press, New York.
4. Stetler CB. Nurses and research: responsibility and involvement. NITA 1983; 6: 207-12.
5. Stetler CB. Research utilization: defining the concept. Image J Nurs Sch 1985; 17: 40-45.
6. Kajermo KN, Nordström G, Krusebrant Å, Björvell H. Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as percieved by a group of registered nurses in Sweden. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27: 798-807.
7. Tydén T. Knowledge Interplay: User-Oriented Research Dissemination Through Synthesis Pedagogics. 1993, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala.
8. Huberman M. Research utillization: the state of the art. Knowledge Policy 1994; 7: 13-33.
9. Dunn WN. Measuring knowledge use. Knowledge - Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1983; 5: 120-33.
10. Stetler CB. Refinement of the Stetler/Marram model for application of research findings to practice. Nurs Outlook 1994; 42: 15-25.
11. Kirchhoff KT. A diffusion survey of coronary precautions. Nurs Res 1982; 31: 196-201.
12. Brett JLL. Use of nursing practice research findings. Nurs Res 1987; 36: 344-9.
13. Coyle LA, Sokop AG. Innovation adoption behavior among nurses. Nurs Res 1990; 39: 176-80.
14. Berggren AC, Swedish midwives' awareness of, attitudes to and use of selected research findings. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23: 462-70.
15. Rizzuto C, Bostrom J, Suter WN, Chenitz WC. Predictors of nurses' involvement in research activities. West J Nurs Res 1994; 16: 193-204.
16. Lacey EA. Research utilization in nursing practice: a pilot study. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 987-95.
17. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. Barriers: the barriers to research utilization scale. Appl Nurs Res 1991; 4: 39-45.
18. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. Barriers to using research findings in practice: the clinician's perspective. Appl Nurs Res 1991; 4: 90-95.
19. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Tornquist EM, Wiese RA. Administrators' views on barriers to research utilization. Appl Nurs Res 1995; 8: 44-49.
20. Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Champagne MT. Barriers and facilitators of research utilization: an integrative review. Nurs Clin North Am 1995; 30: 395-407.
21. Retsas A. Barriers to using research evidence in nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 599-606.
22. Dunn V, Crichton N, Roe B, Seers K, Williams K. Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 1203-10.
23. Kajermo KN, Nordström G, Krusebrant Å, Björvell H. Perceptions of research utilization: comparisons between health care professionals, nursing students and a reference group of nurse clinicians. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 99-109.
24. Kajermo KN, Nordström G, Krusebrant Å, Lützén K. Nurses experiences of research utilization within the framework of an educational programme. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 671-81.
25. Kim HS. Practice theories in nursing and a science of nursing practice. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 1994; 8: 145-58.
26. Meleis AI. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress, 1997, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia.
27. Adamsen L, Fisker J. Forsegsstrategi: Samfundsmæssige Konsekvenser Og Fremtidsperspektiver: Bind 1: Forsøgs- Og Udviklingsprojekter: Generelle Tendenser Og Videreførselsmønstre (a Strategy for Trials. Societal Consequences and Future Perspectives, Vol. 1: Trials and Developmental Projects: General Trends and Implementation Patterns). 1990, Institute of Local Government Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
28. Adamsen L, Fisker J. Forsøgsstrategi: Samfundsmæssige Konsekvenser Og Fremtidsperspektiver: Bind 2: Strukturer, Barrierer Og Visioner I Forsøgs- Og Udviklingsstrategien (a Strategy for Trials. Societal Consequences and Future Perspectives, Vol. 2: Structures, Barriers and Visions of the Trials and Developmental Strategy). 1991, Institute of Local Government Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
29. Larsen K. Praktikuddannelse, Kendte Og Miskendte Sider. Et Observationsstudie Af Praktikuddannelse Inden for Sygeplejerskeuddannelsen (Apprenticeship, Known and Unappreciated Aspects: an Observation Study on Apprenticeship in Nursing Education), Dissertation. 2000, University Hospitals Centre for Nursing and Care Research, Copenhagen.
30. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. 1977, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Bourdieu P. The Logic of Practice. 1990, Polity Press, Cambridge.
32. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. 1983, Basic Books, New York.
33. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. 1991, Polity Press, Cambridge.
34. Giddens A. Living in a post-traditional society. In: Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, eds), 1994, Polity Press, Cambridge, 56-109.
35. Rodgers SE. A study of the utilization of research in practice and the influence of education. Nurse Educ Today 2000; 20: 279-87.
36. Pearcey PA. Achieving research-based nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 1995; 11: 33-39.
37. Hefler L, Tempfer C, Kainz C. Geography of medical publications in the European Union, 1990-98. Lancet 1999; 353: 1856.
38. Rennie D. The present state of medical journals. Lancet 1998; 552: 18-22.
39. Jørgensen HL, Prætorius L, Ingwersen P. Udviklingen i medicinske artikler 1989-98. en undersøgelse af Danmark i forhold til de øvrige medlemmer af den Europæiske Union (Trends concerning medical articles 1989-98: a study of Danish articles compared to other members of the European Union). Ugeskr Laeger 1999; 161: 6339-43.
40. Institute for Scientific Information. 1999 JCR Social Sciences Edition - Subject Category Nursing (electronic material): Institute for Scientific Information. 2001, Available at: http://www.jcrweb.com/.
41. Miller JR, Messenger SR. Obstacles to applying nursing research findings. Am J Nurs 1978; 78: 632-4.
42. Kajermo KN, Nordström G, Krusebrant Å, Björvell H. Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived by a group of registered nurses in Sweden. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27: 798-807.
43. Pettengill MM, Gillies DA, Clark CC. Factors encouraging and discouraging the use of nursing research findings. Image J Nurs Sch 1994; 26: 143-7.
44. Estabrooks CA. The conceptual structure of research utilization. Res Nurs Health 1999; 22: 203-16.
45. Estabrooks CA. Modeling the individual determinants of research utilization. West J Nurs Res 1999; 21: 758-72.
46. Estabrooks CA. Mapping the research utilization field in nursing. Can J Nurs Res 1999; 31: 53-72.