The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss in rats

Hearing Research

Volumn 177, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 81-90

  Chen, Guang Di ^a   Fechter, Laurence D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b Jerry L Pettis Memorial VA Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Hair cell loss; Noise induced hearing loss; Rat

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CELL LOSS; CELL SURVIVAL; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

EID: 0037333448     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00802-X     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bohne, B.A., Clark, W.W., 1982. Growth of hearing loss and cochlear lesion with increasing duration of noise exposure. In: Hamernik, R.P., Henderson, D., Salvi, R. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Noise-induced Hearing Loss. Raven Press, New York, pp. 283-302.
2. Borg E. Loss of hair cells and threshold sensitivity during prolonged noise exposure in normotensive albino rats. Hear. Res. 30:1987;119-126.
3. Borg E., Engstrom B. Noise level, inner hair cell damage, audiometric features, and equal-energy hypothesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1989;1776-1782.
4. Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta. Otolaryngol. 236:(Suppl.):1968;1-135.
5. Chen, G.D., 2002. Effect of hypoxia on noise-induced auditory impairment. Hear. Res. (in press).
6. Chen G.D., Fechter L.D. Potentiation of octave-band noise induced auditory impairment by carbon monoxide. Hear. Res. 132:1999;149-159.
7. Chen G.D., Kong J., Reinhard K., Fechter L.D. NMDA-receptor blocker protects against permanent NIHL but not its potentiation by CO. Hear. Res. 154:2001;108-115.
8. Chen G.D., McWilliams M., Fechter L.D. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity in hair cells: A correlate for permanent threshold elevations. Hear. Res. 145:2000;101-110.
9. Chen G.D., McWilliams M.L., Fechter L.D. Intermittent noise induced hearing loss and the influence of carbon monoxide. Hear. Res. 138:1999;181-191.
10. Clark W.W., Bohne B.A. Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87:(Suppl.):1978;1-16.
11. Clark, W.W., Bohne, B.A., 1986. Cochlear damage: Audiometric correlates? In: Collins, M.J., Glattke, T., Harker, L.A. (Eds.), Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment. University of Iowa Press, IA, pp. 59-82.
12. Clark W.W., Bohne B.A., Boettcher F.A. Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:1987;1253-1264.
13. Engstrom B., Borg E. Cochlear morphology in relation to loss of behavioural, electrophysiological, and middle ear reflex thresholds after exposure to noise. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockholm). 402:(Suppl.):1983;5-23.
14. Fechter L.D., Chen G.D., Johnson D.L. Potentiation of noise induced hearing loss by low concentrations of hydrogen cyanide in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 66:2002;131-138.
15. Fechter L.D., Chen G.D., Rao D., Larabee J. Predicting exposure conditions that facilitate the potentiation of noise-induced hearing loss by carbon monoxide. Toxicol. Sci. 58:2000;315-323.
16. Feldman, A.M., 1981. Cochlear biochemistry. In: Don Brown, R., Daigneault, E.A. (Eds.), Pharmacology of Hearing. Experimental and Clinical Bases A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 51-80.
17. Flock A., Flock B., Fridberger A., Scarfone E., Ulfendahl M. Supporting cells contribute to control of hearing sensitivity. J. Neurosci. 19:1999;4498-4507.
18. Hamernik R.P., Patterson J.H., Turrentine G.A., Ahroon W.A. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear. Res. 38:1989;199-212.
19. Henderson D., Hamernik R.P., Sitler R.W. Audiometric and histological correlates of exposure to 1-msec noise impulses in the chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1974;1210-1221.
20. Hu B.F., Henderson D. Changes in F-actin labeling in the outer hair cell and the Deiters cell in the chinchilla cochlea following noise exposure. Hear. Res. 110:1997;209-218.
21. Hu B., Henderson D., Nicotera T. F-actin cleavage in apoptotic outer hair cells in chinchilla cochleas exposed to intense noise. Hear. Res. 172:2002;62-71.
22. Hunter-Duvar L.M., Elliot D.N. Effects of intense auditory stimulation: Hearing losses and inner ear changes in the squirrel monkey II. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1179-1183.
23. Lataye R., Campo P., Loquet G. Combined effects of noise and styrene exposure on hearing function in the rat. Hear. Res. 139:2000;86-96.
24. Liberman M.C., Beil D.G. Hair cell condition and auditory nerve response in normal and noise-damaged cochleas. Acta Otolaryngol. 88:1979;161-176.
25. Muller M. Frequency representation in the rat cochlea. Hear. Res. 51:1991;247-254.
26. Nordmann A.S., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear. Res. 139:2000;13-30.
27. Ohlemiller K.K., McFadden S.L., Ding D.L., Lear P.M., Ho Y.S. Targeted mutation of the gene for cellular glutathione peroxidase (Gpx1) increases noise-induced hearing loss in mice. JARO. 1:2000;243-254.
28. White D.R., Boettcher F.A., Miles L.R., Gratton M.A. Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic stimulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;1566-1572.
29. Yamasoba T., Dolan D.F., Miller J.M. Acquired resistance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the cochlea, not by systemic responses. Hear. Res. 127:1999;31-40.