Elimination of mucosectomy during restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis may provide better results in low-volume centers

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 185, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 268-272

  Kayaalp, Cuneyt ^a,b   Nessar, Gurel ^a   Akoglu, Musa ^a   Atalay, Fuat ^a  

^a TURKIYE YUKSEK IHTISAS HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anastomosis; Restorative proctocolectomy; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; SEPSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCERATIVE COLITIS; URINE INCONTINENCE;

EID: 0037333338     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01376-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gullberg K., Liljeqvist L. Gains and losses with stapling and omission of loop ileostomy in pelvic pouch surgery a matched control study . Int J Colorectal Dis. 14:1999;255-260.
2. Ziv Y., Fazio V.W., Church J.M., et al. Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg. 171:1996;320-323.
3. Gecim I.E., Wolff B.G., Pemberton J.H., et al. Does technique of anastomosis play any role in developing late perianal abscessor fistula? Dis Colon Rectum. 43:2000;1241-1245.
4. Rachmilewitz D. Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatmentof active ulcerative colitis a randomised trial . BMJ. 298:1989;82-86.
5. Lee E.C., Truelove S. Proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. World J Surg. 4:1980;195-199.
6. Reilly W.T., Pemberton J.H., Wolff B.G., et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg. 225:1997;666-676.
7. Choen S., Tsunoda A., Nicholls R.J. Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 78:1991;430-434.
8. Luukkonen P., Jarvinen H. Stapled versus hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Arch Surg. 128:1993;437-440.
9. Hallgren T.A., Fasth S.B., Oresland T.O., Hulten L.A. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg. 161:1995;915-921.
10. McIntyre P.B., Pemberton J.H., Beart R.W., et al. Double-stapled versus handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 37:1994;430-433.
11. Kayaalp C. Is mucosectomy really necessary? Abstract book of 5th postgraduate course of colorectal surgery in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey, 20-21 October 2000, pp 80-2.
12. Heald R.J., Allen D.R. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation . Br J Surg. 73:1986;571-572.
13. McCourtney J.S., Finlay I.G. Totally stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 84:1997;808-812.
14. O'Connell P.R., Pemberton H.J., Wieland H.L., et al. Does rectal mucosa regenerate after ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 30:1987;1-5.
15. Sequens R. Cancer in the anal canal (transitional zone) after restorative proctocolectomy with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 12:1997;254-255.
16. Rotholtz N.A., Pikarsky A.J., Singh J.J., Wexner S.D. Adenocarcinoma arising from along the rectal stump after double-stapled ileorectal J-pouch in a patient with ulcerative colitis the need to perform a distal anastomosis. Report of a case . Dis Colon Rectum. 44:2001;1214-1217.