Intuitive vs. analytical decision making: Which is preferred?

Scandinavian Journal of Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 17-29

  Sjöberg, Lennart ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037332998     PISSN: 09565221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00041-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agor, W. H. (Ed.), (1989). Intuition in organizations: Leading and managing productively. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119-135.
3. Baron, J. (1998). Judgment misguided: Intuition and error in public decision making. NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Bernstein, P. L. (1996). The new religion of risk management. Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 47.
5. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed). Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
7. Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 819-829.
8. Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1991). Perception of risk. Studies of risk attitudes, perceptions and definitions, Vol. 1. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, Center for Risk Research.
9. Drummond, H. (1999). Analysis and intuition in technological choice: The lessons of Taurus. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(4), 459-466.
10. Dunwoody, P. T., Haarbauer, E., Mahan, R. P., Marino, C., & Tang, C. C. (2000). Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: A test of cognitive continuum theory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 35-54.
11. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
12. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
13. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance. Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
14. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Feldman, M., & March, J. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171-186.
16. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgement research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: APA.
17. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
18. Hammond, K. (1988). Judgement and decision making in dynamic tasks. Information and Decision Technologies, 14, 3-14.
19. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 753-770.
20. Harris, P. (1996). Sufficient grounds for optimism?: The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 9-52.
21. Hatsopoulos, N. G., & Hatsopoulos, G. N. (1999). The role of tacit knowledge in management. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. A. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives (pp. 141-152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of our formulas: Toward and integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 296-310.
23. Kuo, F. Y. (1998). Managerial intuition and the development of executive support systems. Decision support systems, 24(2), 89-103.
24. Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 109-137.
25. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Nilsson, A. (1998). The use of analogy as a management tool. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
27. Nutt, P. C. (1989). Making tough decisions: Tactics for improving managerial decision making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Osbeck, L. M. (1999). Conceptual problems in the development of a psychological notion of "intuition". Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1999, 39(3), 229.
29. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219-235.
30. Ross, M., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson, Handbook of social psychology, Special fields and applications, Vol. II. (pp (pp. 73-122). New York: Random House.
31. Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252-266.
32. Simon, H. A. (1989). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. In W. H. Agor (Ed.), Intuition in organizations: Leading and managing productively (pp. 29-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Sjöberg, L. (1971). The new functionalism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 12, 29-52.
34. Sjöberg, L. (1980). Volitional problems in carrying through a difficult decision. Acta Psychologica, 45, 123-132.
35. Sjöberg, L. (1985). Motivation and compliance: How assessed, how important. In J. Hirsch, & T. B. Van Itallie (Eds.), Recent advances in obesity research IV (pp. 275-280). London: John Libbey.
36. Sjöberg, L. (1993). Every-day life decisions and stress. In A healthier work environment. Basic concepts and methods of measurement (pp. 213-231). Copenhagen: WHO.
37. Sjöberg, L. (1998). Risk perception: Experts and the public. European Psychologist, 3, 1-13.
38. Sjöberg, L. (1999). Risk perception by the public and by experts: A dilemma in risk management. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 1-9.
39. Sjöberg, L. (2000). The different dynamics of personal and general risk. In M. P. Cottom, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Pape, & J. Tait, Foresight and precaution., Vol. 1 (pp. 1149-1155). Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
40. Sjöberg, L. (in press). Are received risk perception models alive and well? Risk Analysis.
41. Sjöberg, L., & Magneberg, R. (1990). Action and emotion in everyday life. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 9-27.
42. Stewart, T. R., Roebber, P. J., & Bosart, L. F. (1997). The importance of the task in analyzing expert judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(3), 205-219.
43. Stumpf, S. A., & Dunbar, R. L. M. (1991). The effect of personality type on choices made in strategic decision situations. Decision Sciences, 22(5), 1047-1072.
44. Whitecotton, S. M., Sanders, D. E., & Norris, K. B. (1988). Improving predictive accuracy with a combination of human intuition and mechanical decision aids. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(3), 325-348.