Identifying extensions required by RUP (Rational Unified Process) to comply with CMM (Capability Maturity Model) levels 2 and 3

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 181-192

  Manzoni, Lisandra V ^a   Price, Roberto T ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b TeleNova Comms   (United States)

Author keywords

Capability Maturity Model; CMM; Process assessment model; Rational Unified Process; RUP; Software process; Software quality; UML; Unified Modeling Language

Indexed keywords

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; STANDARDS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL (CMM); RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESSES (RUP); UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE (UML);

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0037330824     PISSN: 00985589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2003.1178058     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A.A. Alcântara, T.M.M. Maciel, S.L. Meira, and F.Q.B. da Silva, "Uso do Processo RUP na Implantação da ISO 9000-3," Proc. Sixth Workshop Qualidade de Software, pp. 60-71, 1999.
2. A. April and F. Coallier, "Trillium: Model for Telecom Product Development and Support Process Capability," Proc. Second IEEE Software Eng. Standards Symp., Aug. 1995.
3. J. Boegh, S. Depanfilis, B. Kitchenham, and A. Pasquini, "A Method For Software Quality Planning, Control, and Evaluation," IEEE Software, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 69-85, Mar. 1999.
4. G. Booch, Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, second ed. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., 1994.
5. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language Users Guide. Addison Wesley, 1999.
6. B. Fitzgerald and T. O'Kane, "A Longitudinal Study of Software Process Improvement," IEEE Software, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 37-45, May 1999.
7. V. Haase, G. Koch, H.J. Kugler, and P. Decrinis, "Bootstrap: Fine-Tuning Process Assessment," IEEE Software, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 25-35, July 1994.
8. B. Henderson-Sellers, R. Dué, and I. Graham, "Third Generation OO Processes: A Critique of RUP and OPEN from a Project Management Perspective," Proc. Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Eng. Conf. (APSEC' 2000), pp. 428-435, 2000.
9. J. Herbsleb, A. Carleton, J. Rozum, J. Siegel, and D. Zubrow, "Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement Initial Results," Technical Report CMM/SEI-94-TR-13, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1994, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/94.reports/pdf/tr13.94.pdf.
10. ISO 9000-3, "ISO 9000-3 Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001 to the Development, Supply, and Maintenance of Software," Int'l Standards Organization, Geneva, 1991, http://www.iso.org/.
11. ISO/IEC 12207, "ISO/IEC 12207 Information Technology-Software Life-Cycle Processes," Int'l Standards Organization, Geneva, 1995, http://www.iso.org/.
12. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh, Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
13. I. Jacobson, M. Christerson, P. Jonsson, and G. Overgaard, Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case-Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, 1992.
14. P. Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process-An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
15. E.G. McGuire, "Initial Effects of Software Process Improvement on an Experienced Software Development Team," Proc. 29th Ann. Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences, pp. 713-721, 1998.
16. M. Paulk, "Effective CMM-Based Process Improvement," Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. Software Quality (ICSQ'96), pp. 226-237, 1996.
17. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis, and C. Weber, "Capability Maturity Model for Software," Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1993, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/93.reports/pdf/tr24.93.pdf.
18. M. Paulk et al., "Key Practices of Capability Maturity Model for Software," Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-25, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1993, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/93.reports/pdf/tr25.93.pdf.
19. CMMI Product Team, "Capability Maturity Model, Integration (CMMI)," Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-011, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn., Mar. 2002, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/02.reports /pdf/02tr011.pdf.
20. Project Management Institute, Inc., "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge," 2000 ed., 2000, http://www.pmi.org.
21. Rational Software Corporation, "Rational Unified Process," Version 2001.3, CD-ROM, Rational Software, Cupertino, Calif.: 2001.
22. Rational Software Corporation, "Rational Unified Process, "Version 5.5, CD-ROM, Rational Software, Cupertino, Calif.: 1999.
23. Rational Software Corporation, "Rational Unified Process Best Practices for Software Development Teams," White Paper, 1998, http://www.rational.com/media/whitepapers/rup_bestpractices.pdf.
24. Rational Software Corporation, "Assessing the Rational Unified Process against ISO/IEC15504-5: Information Technology-Software Process Assessment Part 5: An Assessment Model and Indicator Guidance," White Paper, 2000, http://www.rational. com/products/whitepapers/rup_iso.jsp.
25. J. Rumbaugh, M.R. Blaha, W. Lorensen, F. Eddy, and W. Premerlani, Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall, 1991.
26. ISO/IEC 15504, "Information Technology-Software Process Assessment-Part 1: Concepts and Introductory Guide," Technical Report ISO/IEC TR 15504-1:1998, Int'l Standards Organization, JTC 1/SC 7, 1998, http://www.iso.org/.
27. J. Smith, "Reaching CMM Level 2 and 3 with the Rational Unified Process," White Paper, 2000, http://www.rational.com/products/whitepapers/100416.jsp.
28. R.W. Reitzig, C. Rodriguez, and G. Holt, "Achieving Capability Maturity Model Level 2 with Rational Unified Process," Rational White Paper, 2002, http://www.cognence.com/AchievingCMM-Level2.pdf.
29. M.P. Ginsberg and L.H. Quinn, "Process Tailoring and the Software Capability Maturity Model," Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-024, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Penn. 1995, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/94.reports/pdf /tr24.94.pdf.
30. M.E.C. Hull, P.S. Taylor, J.R.P. Hanna, and R.J. Millar, "Software Development Processes-An Assessment," Information and Software Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1-12, Jan. 2002.
31. B. Henderson-Sellers, G. Collins, R. Dué, and I.M. Graham, "A Qualitative Comparison of Two Processes for Object-Oriented Software Development," Information and Software Technology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 705-724, Dec. 2001.
32. A. Fuggeta, "Software Process: A Roadmap," Proc. 22nd Int'l Conf. Software Eng.-Future of Software Eng., pp. 25-34, 2000.
33. L.V. Manzoni, "Using a Workflow Management System to Support Software Development Based on Extended Rational Unified Process to Reach Maturity Model Levels 2 and 3," master dissertation, Inst. of Informatics, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2001, http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/amadeus/atuais/lisandra.html.