Intractability in environmental disputes: Exploring a complex construct

Journal of Planning Literature

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 360-371

  Campbell, Marcia Caton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict resolution theory; Environmental conflict; Environmental dispute resolution; Intractability

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING PRACTICE;

EID: 0037329020     PISSN: 08854122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885412202239138     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Amy, Douglas J. 1990. Environmental dispute resolution: The promise and the pitfalls. In Environmental policy in the 1990s: Toward a new agenda, Norman J. Vig and Michael E. Kraft, eds. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
2. Amy, Douglas J. 1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Beckman, Norman. 1973. The planner as bureaucrat. Reprinted in A Reader in Planning Theory, Andreas Faludi, ed. New York: Pergamon. Original article, Journal of the American Institute of Plannners 30, 4: 323-327, 1964.
4. Bingham, Gail. 1986. Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
5. Borrelli, Peter. 1988. The ecophilosophers. In Crossroads: Environmental priorities for the future, Peter Borrelli, ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6. Brett, Jeanne M., Debra L. Shapiro, and Anne L. Lytle. 1996. Refocusing rights- and power-oriented negotiators toward integrative negotiations: Process and outcome effects. Paper presented at Academy of Management Proceedings, August 11-14, Cincinnatti, OH.
7. Brooke, James. 1998. Sprawling Albuquerque hopes to cut through monument. New York Times (January 25): 12.
8. Burgess, Guy, and Heidi Burgess. 1998. Some thoughts on intractable conflict: Conference framing essay. Paper presented at a meeting of the Hewlett-Funded Centers for the Study of Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, January 9-11, Palo Alto, CA.
9. Burgess, Guy, and Heidi Burgess. 1995. Beyond the limits: Dispute resolution of intractable environmental conflicts. In Mediating environmental conflicts: Theory and practice, J. Walton Blackburn and Willa Marie Bruce, eds. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
10. Burgess, Heidi, and Guy Burgess. 1996. Constructive confrontation: A transformative approach to intractable conflicts. Mediation Quarterly 13, 4: 305-322.
11. Bush, Robert A. Baruch, and Joseph P. Folger. 1994. The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Carpenter, Susan L., and W. J. D. Kennedy. 2001. Managing public disputes: A practical guide for government, business, and citizens' groups. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Catanese, Anthony J. 1984. The politics of planning and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Caton Campbell, Marcia. 1998. Exploring the characteristics of intractable environmental disputes. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November 4-8, Pasadena, CA.
15. Caton Campbell, Marcia, and Donald W. Floyd. 1996. Thinking critically about environmental mediation. Journal of Planning Literature 10, 3: 235-47.
16. Christensen, Karen S. 1985. Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 51, 1: 63-71.
17. Coleman, Peter T. 2000. Intractable conflict. In The handbook of conflict resolution, Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. d'Estrée, Tamara Pearson, and Bonnie G. Colby. 2000. Guidebook for analyzing success in environmental conflict resolution cases. Fairfax, VA: The Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University.
19. Deutsch, Morton. 2000. A framework for thinking about research on conflict resolution training. In The handbook of conflict resolution, Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Dietz, Thomas. 2001. Thinking about environmental conflicts. In Celebrating scholarship, Lisa M. Kadous, ed. Fairfax, VA: College of Arts and Sciences, George Mason University.
21. Dorius, Noah. 1993. Land use negotiation: Reducing conflict and creating wanted land uses. Journal of the American Planning Association 59, 1: 101-6.
22. Dotson, A. Bruce, David Godschalk, and Jerome Kaufman. 1989. The planner as dispute resolver: Concepts and teaching materials. Washington, DC: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.
23. Dukes, E. Franklin. 1996. Resolving public conflict: Transforming community and governance. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
24. Fessenden, Lynne. 1999. Evaluating the success of the New Community Meeting II on issues of growth and sustainable development in central Lane County, Oregon (1997-1998). Eugene, OR: The Conflict Resolution Center.
25. Floyd, Donald W. 1993. Managing rangeland resource conflicts. Rangelands 15, 1: 27-30.
26. Forester, John. 1999. Dealing with deep value differences. In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Forester, John. 1992. Envisioning the politics of public sector dispute resolution. In Studies in law, politics, and society, Susan S. Silbey and Austin Sarat, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28. Forester, John. 1987. Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulations. Journal of the American Planning Association 53, 3: 303-14.
29. Forester, John, and David Stitzel. 1989. Beyond neutrality: The possibilities of activist mediation in public sector conflicts. Negotiation Journal 5, 3: 251-64.
30. Friedmann, John, and Carol Kuester. 1994. Planning education for the late twentieth century: An initial inquiry. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, 1: 55-64.
31. Glavovic, Bruce C., E. Franklin Dukes, and Jana M. Lynott. 1997. Training and educating environmental mediators: Lessons from experience in the United States. Mediation Quarterly 14, 4: 269-92.
32. Godschalk, David R. 1992. Negotiating intergovernmental policy conflicts: Practice-based guidelines. Journal of the American Planning Association 58, 3: 368-78.
33. Gray, Barbara. 1997. Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In Research on negotiation in organizations, Roy J. Lewicki, Robert J. Bies, and Blair H. Sheppard, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
34. Gray, Barbara, Julie Younglove-Webb, and Jill M. Purdy. 1997. Frame repertoires, conflict styles and negotiation outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association of Conflict Management, June 15-19, Bonn, Germany.
35. Greenhalgh, Leonard. 1986. Managing conflict. Sloan Management Review 27 (summer): 45-51.
36. Hamilton, Michael S. 1991. Environmental mediation: Requirements for successful institutionalization. In Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector, Miriam K. Mills, ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
37. Howe, Elizabeth. 1992. Professional roles and the public interest in planning. Journal of Planning Literature 6, 3: 230-48.
38. Hunter, Susan. 1989. The roots of environmental conflict in the Tahoe Basin. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
39. Innes, Judith E. 1999. Evaluating consensus building. In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65, 4: 412-23.
41. Jacobs, Harvey M., and Richard G. RuBino. 1988. Predicting the utility of environmental mediation: Natural resource and conflict typologies as a guide to environmental conflict assessment. Madison, WI: Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School.
42. Kriesberg, Louis. 1993. Intractable conflicts. Peace Review 5, 4: 417-21.
43. Kriesberg, Louis. 1989. Conclusion: Research and policy implications. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
44. Lewicki, Roy J., and Craig Davis. 1996. Environmental conflict frames in wetland conversion disputes. Paper presented at the Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, April 11, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
45. Lewicki, Roy J., David M. Saunders, and John W. Minton. 2001. Essentials of negotiation. 2d ed. Chicago: Irwin.
46. MacDonnell, Lawrence J. 1988. Natural resources dispute resolution: An overview. Natural Resources Journal 28, 1: 5-19.
47. Maser, Chris. 1996. Resolving environmental conflict: Towards sustainable community development. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
48. Meyerson, Martin, and Edward Banfield, eds. 1955. Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press.
49. Northrup, Terrell A. 1989. The dynamic of identity in personal and social conflict. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
50. Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. O'Leary, Rosemary. 1995. Environmental mediation: What do we know and how do we know it? In Mediating environmental conflicts: Theory and practice, J. Walton Blackburn and Willa Marie Bruce, eds. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
52. O'Leary, Rosemary, Tracy Yandle, and Tamilyn Moore. 1999. The state of the states in environmental dispute resolution. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14, 2: 515-613.
53. Ozawa, Connie P. 1991. Recasting science: Consensual procedures in public policy making. Boulder, CO: Westview.
54. Painter, An. 1988. The future of environmental dispute resolution. Natural Resources Journal 28, 1: 145-70.
55. Pinkley, Robin L. 1990. Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 2: 117-26.
56. Pinkley, Robin L., and Gregory B. Northcraft. 1994. Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 37, 1: 193-205.
57. Pruitt, Dean G., and Paul V. Olczak. 1995. Beyond hope: Approaches to resolving seemingly intractable conflict. In Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch, Barbara B. Bunker, Jeffrey Z. Rubin, and Associates, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Rabe, Barry G. 1991. Impediments to environmental dispute resolution in the American political context. In Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector, Miriam K. Mills, ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
59. Rabinovitz, Francine F. 1989. The role of negotiation in planning, management, and policy analysis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 8, 2: 87-95.
60. Rubinstein, Robert A. 1998. Intractable conflicts and possibilities for resolution: Conference framing essay. Paper presented at a meeting of the Hewlett-Funded Centers for the Study of Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, January 9-11, Palo Alto, CA.
61. Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
62. Sheppard, Blair H. 1984. Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Research in organizational behavior, Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
63. Sipe, Neil G. 1998. An empirical analysis of environmental mediation. Journal of the American Planning Association 64, 3: 275-85.
64. Smyth, Leo F. 1994. Intractable conflict and the role of identity. Negotiation Journal 10, 4: 311-21.
65. Socolow, Robert H. 1976. Failures of discourse: Obstacles to the integration of environmental values into natural resource policy. In When values conflict: Essays on environmental analysis, discourse, and decision, Lawrence A. Tribe, Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss, eds. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
66. Spain, Daphne. 1993. Been-heres versus come-heres: Negotiating conflicting community identities. Journal of the American Planning Association 59, 2: 156-71.
67. Susskind, Lawrence, and the Consensus Building Institute. 1999. Using assisted negotiation to settle land use disputes: A guidebook for public officials. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
68. Susskind, Lawrence, and Jeffrey Cruikshank. 1987. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
69. Susskind, Lawrence, and Patrick Field. 1996. Dealing with an angry public: The mutual gains approach to resolving disputes. New York: Free Press.
70. Susskind, Lawrence, and Connie Ozawa. 1984. Mediated negotiation in the public sector: The planner as mediator. Journal of Planning Education and Research 4, 1: 5-15.
71. Susskind, Lawrence, and Connie Ozawa. 1983. Mediated negotiation in the public sector. Mediator accountability and the public interest problem. American Behavioral Scientist 27, 2: 255-79.
72. Susskind, Lawrence, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer. 1999. Conducting a conflict assessment. In The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKeaman, and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Susskind, Lawrence, Mieke van der Wansem, and Armand Ciccarelli. 2000. Mediating land use disputes: Pros and cons. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
74. Thorson, Stuart J. 1989. Introduction: Conceptual issues. In Intractable conflicts and their transformation, Louis Kriesberg, Terrell A. Northrup, and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
75. Tribe, Lawrence H., Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss, eds. 1976. When values conflict: Essays on environmental analysis, discourse, and decision. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
76. Ury, William L., Jeanne M. Brett, and Stephen B. Goldberg. 1988. Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
77. Wondolleck, Julia M., and Steven L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
78. Yi, Gi-Chul. 1992. An analysis of disputants' conflict frames relating to Ohio wetland conversion disputes. Ph.D. diss., School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
79. Zartman, I. William, and Johannes Aurik. 1991. Power strategies in de-escalation. In Timing and the de-escalation of international conflicts, Louis Kriesberg and Stuart J. Thorson, eds. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.