Beyond task dissociation logic: A richer conception of cognitive neuropsychology

Cortex

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 196-202

  McCloskey, Michael ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDER; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LOGIC; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0037323663     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70101-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bullinaria JA and Chater N. Connectionist modelling: Implications for cognitive neuropsychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10: 227-264, 1995.
2. Caramazza A and Miceli G. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37: 243-297, 1990.
3. Chater N and Ganis G. Double dissociation and isolable cognitive processes. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, pp. 668-672.
4. Cubelli R. A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature, 353: 258-260, 1991.
5. Ganis G and Chater N. Can double dissociation uncover the modularity of cognitive processes? In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, pp. 714-718.
6. Jones GV. On double dissociation of function. Neuropsychologia, 21: 397-400, 1983.
7. McCloskey M. Future directions in cognitive neuropsychology. In B Rapp (Ed), What Deficits Reveal About the Human Mind/Brain: A Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. Phildelphia: Psychology Press, 2001, pp. 593-610.
8. McCloskey M, Badecker W, Goodman-Schulman RA and Aliminosa D. The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11: 341-392, 1994.
9. Plaut DC. Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17: 291-321, 1995.
10. Rapp B, Benzing L and Caramazza A. The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 71-104, 1997.
11. Robertson LC, Knight RT, Rafal R and Shimamura AP. Cognitive neuropsychology is more than single-case studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19: 710-717, 1993.
12. Shallice T. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
13. Tainturier M-J and Caramazza A. The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 53-73, 1996.
14. Van Orden GC, Pennington BF and Stone GO. What do double dissociations prove? Cognitive Science, 25: 111-172, 2001.
15. Venneri A and Cubelli R. Letter doubling is independently computed by the brain: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Paper presented at TENNET IV, Montreal, Canada, 1993.