A neural network approach for structural identification and diagnosis of a building from seismic response data

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 187-206

  Huang, C S ^a   Hung, S L ^a   Wen, C M ^a   Tu, T T ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Damage assessment; Earthquake responses; Neural network; System identification

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKES; NEURAL NETWORKS; STEEL; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

SEISMIC RESPONSE DATA;

SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BUILDING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST;

EID: 0037320675     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.219     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hearn G, Testa RB. Modal analysis for damage detection in structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1991; 117(10):3042-3063.
2. Alampalli S, Fu GK. Full scale dynamic monitoring of highway bridges. Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, vol. 1, 1993; 1602-1607.
3. Salawu OS, Williams C. Bridge assessment using forced-vibration testing. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1995; 121(2):161-173.
4. Koh CG, See LM, Balenra T. Damage detection of buildings: Numerical and experimental studies. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1995; 121(8):1155-1160.
5. Wu X, Ghaboussi J, Garrett JH. Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage. Computers and Structures, 1992; 42(4):649-659.
6. Elkordy MF, Chang KC, Lee GC. Neural networks trained by analytically simulated damage states. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 7(2):130-145.
7. Szewczyk ZP, Hajela P. Damage detection in structures based on feature-sensitive neural network. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering (ASCE) 1994; 8(2):163-178.
8. Pandey PC, Barai SV. Multilayer perceptron in damage detection of bridge structures. Computers and Structures 1995; 54(4):597-608.
9. Zhao J, Ivan JN, DeWolf JT. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems (ASCE) 1998; 4(3):93-101.
10. Masri SF, Smyth AW, Chassiakos AG, Caughey TK, Hunter NF. Application of neural networks for detection of changes in nonlinear systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126(7):666-676.
11. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning international representation by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing, Rumelhart DE, et al. (eds). The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986; 318-362.
12. Hecht-Nielsen R. Theory of the back propagation neural network. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE: New York, 1989; 1:593-605.
13. Hung SL, Lin YL. application of an L-BFGS neural network learning algorithm in engineering analysis and design. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Structural Engineering. Chinese Society of Structural Engineering: Taiwan, R.O.C., 1994 (in Chinese).
14. Nocedal J. Updating quasi-Newton matrix with limited storage. Mathematics of Computation 1980; 35:20-33.
15. Huang CS. Structural identification from ambient vibration measurement using the multivariate AR model. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2001; 241(3):337-359.
16. Huang CS. A study on techniques for analyzing ambient vibration measurement (II)-time series methods. Report No. NCREE-99-018, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering. R. O. C., 1999 (in Chinese).
17. Allemang RL, Brown DL. A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. Proceedings of the first International Model Analysis Conference, Bethel, Connecticut, U.S.A., 1983; 110-116.
18. Trifunac D. Comparisons between ambient and forced vibration experiments. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1972; 1:133-150.
19. Yeh SC, Cheng CP, Loh CH. Shaking table tests on scaled down five-story steel structures. NCREE Report No. NCREE-99-002, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, R.O.C., 1999 (in Chinese).
20. Huang CS, Lin HL. Modal identification of structures from ambient vibration, free vibration, and seismic response data via a subspace approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1857-1878.