Automated dispensing of parenteral nutrition formulations

Hospital Pharmacist

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 63-65

  Shah, Jigna ^a  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL FEEDING; DEVICE; HUMAN; MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PATIENT; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PEDIATRICS; PHARMACY; PRESCRIPTION; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037319712     PISSN: 13527967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Duncombe R. Information technology: Inregrating IT for technical services. Hosp Pharm 2001;8:163-5.
2. Bethune K, Allwood M, Grainger C, Wormleighton C. Use of filters during the preparation and administration of parenteral nutrition: Position paper and guidelines. Prepared by the British Pharmaceutical Nutrition Group Working Party. Nutrition 2001;17:403-8.
3. Cousins DH, Upton DR. Medication errors: Are aseptic dispensing services risky? Pharm in Prac 1995;5:227-8.
4. Farwell J. Aseptic dispensing for NHS patients (Farwell report). London: Department of Health; 1995.
5. Beaney AM. The quality assurance of aseptic preparation services. 3rd ed. London: NHS Quality Control Committee; 2001. p62.
6. The future of centralised intravenous additive services (CIVAS). Joint meeting of the National CIVAS Group and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Hospital Pharmacists Group. Hosp Pharm 2000;7:189-92.
7. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Hospital Pharmacists Group. Aseptic preparation: pharmacy's responsibility in managing risk. Pharm J 2002;268:193.
8. The Medicines Control Agency. Rules and guidance for pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors. London: The Stationery Office; 1997.
9. Good automated manufacturing practice (GAMP) guide for validation of automated systems in pharmaceutical manufacture. The International Society for pharmaceutical engineering and the GAMP forum; 1998.