Effects of herbaceous competition control on wildlife habitat quality in piedmont pine plantations

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-60

  Keyser, P D ^a   Ford, V L ^a   Guynn Jr , D C ^b  

^a MeadWestvaco Corporation   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forage; Habitat; Herbaceous control; Herbicide; Pine management; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

SEED; VEGETATION;

HERBACEOUS CONTROL;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

PLANTATIONS; PLANTS; SEEDLINGS;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0037319562     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/27.1.55     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ANTHONY, R.G., AND M.L. MORRISON, 1985. Influence of glyphosate herbicide on small mammal populations in western Oregon. Northwest Sci. 59:159-168.
2. ARNER, D.H. 1960. Effects of rights of way techniques on vegetation. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Natur. Resourc. Conf. 25:378-386.
3. BLAKE, P.M., G.A. HURST, AND T.A. TERRY. 1987. Responses of vegetation and deer forage following application of Hexazinone. South. J. App. For. 11(4):176-180.
4. BROOKS, J.J., A.S. JOHNSON, AND K.V. MILLER. 1993. Effects of chemical site preparation on wildlife habitat and plant species diversity in the Georgia Sandhills. P. 605-612 in Proc. of the seventh bienn, south. silvic, res. conf., Brissette, J.C. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-93.
5. D'ANIERI, P., D.M. LESLIE, JR., AND M.L. MCCORMACK, JR. 1987. Small mammals in glysophate-treated clearcuts in northern Maine. Can. Field Natur. 101:547-550.
6. HURST, G.A. 1987. Vegetation responses to imazapyr for pine release. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:247.
7. HURST, G.A. 1988. Vegetation following imazapyr for site preparation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:201.
8. HURST, G.A., AND W.E. PALMER. 1988. Vegetative responses to hexazinone for site preparation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:210.
9. MCCOMB, W.C., AND G.A. HURST. 1987. Herbicides and wildlife in southern forests. P. 28-36 in Managing southern forests for wildlife and fish, a proceedings. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-65.
10. MCNEASE, L.L., AND G.A. HURST. 1991. Preharvest treatment with imazapyr for seed tree regeneration and habitat improvement. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:265.
11. MILLER, J.H., R.S. BOYD, AND M.B. EDWARDS. 1999. Floristic diversity, stand structure, and composition 11 years after herbicide site preparation. Can. J. For. Res. 29:1073-1083.
12. MILLER, J.H., AND K.V. MILLER. 1999. Forest plants of the Southeast and their wildlife uses. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 435 p.
13. MILLER, K.V., AND B.R. CHAPMAN. 1995. Responses of vegetation, birds, and small mammals to chemical and mechanical site preparation. P. 146-148 in Second international conference on forest vegetation management, Gaskins, R.E., and J.A. Zabkiewicz (comps.) N. Z. For. Res. Inst. Bull. No. 192.
14. O'CONNELL, W.E., AND K.V. MILLER. 1994. Site preparation influences on vegetation composition and avian and small mammal communities in the South Carolina upper coastal plain. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agenc. 48:321-330.
15. SAS INSTITUTE. 1996. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
16. SMITH, R.L. 1980. Ecology and field biology, Ed. 3. Harper and Row, New York. 835 p.
17. ZUTTER, B.R., G.R. GLOVER, AND D.H. GJERSTAD. 1987. Vegetation response to intensity of herbaceous weed control in a newly planted loblolly pine plantation. New For. 4:257-271.