Auditory event-related potentials in the assessment of auditory processing disorders: A pilot study

Neuropediatrics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-29

  Liasis, Alki ^a   Bamiou, D E ^a   Campbell, P ^a   Sirimanna, T ^a   Boyd, S ^a   Towell, A ^a,b  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory processing disorder; Mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MYELINATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHONEME; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING TEST; STIMULUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; CHILD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037317733     PISSN: 0174304X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38622     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Speech and Language Hearing Association. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 1996; 5: 2
2. Baran J, Musiek FE. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In: Musiek FE, Rintelman WF (eds). Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999
3. British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 213-216
4. Bruneau N, Roux S, Guerin P, Barthelemy C. Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4-8-year-old children. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 32-38
5. Cacace AT, McFarland DJ. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 355-73.
6. Cheour M, Alho K, Sainio K, Reinikainen K et al. The mismatch negativity to changes in speech sounds at the age of three months. Dev Neuropsychol 1997; 13: 167-174
7. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997
8. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 919-924
9. Giard MH, Perrin F, Echallier JF, Thevenet M, Froment JC, Pernier J. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 238-252
10. Hurley RM, Musiek FE. Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad of Audiol 1994; 5: 195-203
11. Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 467-474
12. Keith RW. SCAN - A screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. Cincinatti, Ohio: Psychological Corporation, 1986
13. Keith RW. SCAN - A Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Adolescents and Adults. Cincinatti, Ohio: Psychological Corporation, 1994
14. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93-105
15. Kraus N, McGee T, Micco A, Sharma A, Carrell T, Nicol T. Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 123-130
16. Liasis A, Towell A, Alho K, Boyd S. Intracranial identification of a frontal component to acoustic change: a case study. Cogn Brain Res 2001; 11: 227-233
17. Marriage J, King J, Briggs J, Lutman ME. The reliability of the SCAN test: results from a primary school population in the UK. Br Audiol 2001; 35: 199-208
18. Moore JK, Perazzo LM, Braun A. Time course of axonal myelination in the human brainstem auditory pathway. Hear Res 1995; 87: 21-31
19. Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Lamb LE, Lamb P. Selected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction. Semin Hear 1990; 11: 372-383
20. Musiek FE, Gollegly K, Ross M. Profiles of types of auditory processing disorders in children with learning disabilities. J Child Comm Dis 1985; 9: 43-63
21. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Beh Brain Sci 1990; 13: 201-288
22. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 6-18
23. Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24: 375-425
24. Pallier C, Dupoux E, Jeannin X. EXPE; an expandable programming language for on-line physiological experiments. Beh Res Methods, Instruments and Computers 1997; 29: 322-327
25. Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: Neuromagnetic evidence. J Cog Neurosci 1993; 5: 363-370
26. Schwartz DM, Morris MD, Jacobson JT. The normal auditory brainstem response and its variants. In: Jacobson JT (ed). Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials. Chapter 6. London: Allyn and Bacon, 1994
27. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee TJ, Nicol TG. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 540-545
28. Tallal P, Miller SL, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, Schreiner C et al. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 1996; 271: 81-84
29. Tonnquist-Uhlen I, Borg E, Spens KE. Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in normal children, with particular reference to the N1 component. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 95: 34-41