Density-dependent responses of reproductive allocation to elevated atmospheric CO2 in Phytolacca americana

New Phytologist

Volumn 157, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 229-239

  He, J S ^a   Bazzaz, F A ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Density dependence; Elevated CO2; Minimum size for flowering; Phytolacca americana; Reproduction; Reproductive allocation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

PHYTOLACCA AMERICANA;

EID: 0037314084     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00660.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. 2 gradients: non-linear responses and implications for community change. Global Change Biology 1: 199-207.
2. 2 concentration. Field Crops Research 73: 1-34.
3. Armesto JJ, Cheplick GP, McDonnell MJ. 1983. Observations on the reproductive biology of Phytolacca americana (Phytolaccaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 110: 380-383.
4. 2 levels. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 167-196.
5. Bazzaz FA. 1997. Allocation of resources in plants: state of the sciences and critical questions. In: Bazzaz FA, Grace J, eds. Plant resource allocation. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1-37.
6. Bazzaz FA, Ackerly DD, Reekie EG. 2000. Reproductive allocation in plants. In: Fenner M, ed. Seeds, the ecology of regeneration in plant communities, 2nd edn. Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 1-30.
7. 2 enrichment and dependence of reproduction on density in an annual plant and a simulation of its population dynamics. Journal of Ecology 80: 643-651.
8. 2 enriched environments - parallel results from 2 model systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 8161-8165.
9. 2 environments: no evidence for optimal partitioning. Global Change Biology 6: 855-863.
10. Casper BB, Cahill JF. 1998. Population-level responses to nutrient heterogeneity and density by Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae): an experimental neighborhood approach. American Journal of Botany 85: 1680-1687.
11. Caulkins DB, Wyatt R. 1990. Variation and taxonomy of Phytolacca americana and P. rigida in the southeastern United States. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 117: 357-367.
12. 2 on fecundity in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Oecologia 97: 100-105.
13. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313.
14. 2 environments. Oecologia 104: 454-466.
15. 2 alters anatomy, physiology, growth, and reproduction of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.). Oecologia 108: 599-609.
16. 2 on plants. III. Flower, fruit and seed production and abortion. New Phytologist 98: 433-446.
17. 2 during growth. Ecology 71: 1185-1194.
18. Gifford RM, Barrett DJ, Lutze JL, Samarakoon AB. 1996. Agriculture and global change: scaling direct carbon dioxide impacts and feedbacks through time. In: Walker B, Steffen W, eds. Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 229-259.
19. Goudriaan J, Shugart HH, Bugmann H, Cramer W, Bondeau A, Gardner RH, Hunt LA, Lauenroth WK, Landsberg JJ, Linder S, Nobel IR, Parton WJ, Pitelka LF, Smith MS, Sutherst RW, Valentin C, Woodward FI. 1999. Use of models in global change studies. In: Walker B, Steffen W, Canadell J, Ingram J, eds. The terrestrial biosphere and global change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 106-140.
20. Grace J. 1997. Towards models of resource allocation by plants. In: Bazzaz, FA, Grace, J, eds. Plant resource allocation. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 279-291.
21. Grace JB, Tilman D. 1990. Perspective on plant competition. New York, USA: Academic Press.
22. 2 in wild cereals of the northern Negev of Israel. Global Change Biology 6: 631-638.
23. Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. New York, USA: Academic Press.
24. Hirose T. 1987. A vegetative plant growth model: adaptive significance of phenotypic plasticity in matter partitioning. Functional Ecology 1: 195-202.
25. Ho LC. 1988. Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 39: 355-378.
26. 2 environment on seed quality and subsequent seedling performance in Bromus rubens. Oecologia 114: 202-208.
27. 2. Functional Ecology 13: 769-777.
28. 2 and nitrogen in Raphanus varieties. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 533-545.
29. 2-enriched grassland. Journal of Biogeography 22: 221-225.
30. 2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98: 257-262.
31. 2 enrichment and defoliation by a native annual plant Heterotheca subaxillaris. Global Change Biology 6: 767-778.
32. 2. Acta Oecologica 22: 61-69.
33. 2 enrichment. Ecological Applications 10: 1590-1619.
34. Lacey EP. 1986. Onset of reproduction in plants: size- versus age-dependency. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1: 72-75.
35. 2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292: 95-98.
36. Lawlor DW, Keys AJ. 1993. Understanding photosynthetic adaptation to changing climate. In: Fowden L, Mansfield TA, Stoddart J, eds. Plant adaption to environmental stress. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 85-106.
37. 2 and light environment on growth and reproductive performance of four annual species. New Phytologist 144: 455-462.
38. Leishman MR, Wright IJ, Moles AT, Westoby M. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of seed size. In: Fenner M, ed. Seeds, the ecology of regeneration in plant community, 2nd edn. Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing, 31-58.
39. Levin SA, Mooney HA, Field CB. 1989. The dependence of plant root: shoot ratios on internal nitrogen concentration. Annals of Botany 64: 71-76.
40. McGinley M, Charnov EL. 1988. Multiple resources and the optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Evolutionary Ecology 2: 77-84.
41. Meekins JF, McCarthy BC. 2000. Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. Journal of Ecology 88: 447-463.
42. 2 enrichment of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): development, growth and yield. Global Change Biology 4: 163-172.
43. 2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 659-682.
44. Parrish JAD, Bazzaz FA. 1985. Nutrient content of Abutilon theophrasti seeds and the competitive ability of the resulting plants. Oecologia 65: 247-251.
45. 2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105: 77-97.
46. 2. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 473-490.
47. 2. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 2475-2481.
48. 2 on time of flowering in four short-day and four long-day species. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 533-538.
49. Rees M, Sheppard A, Briese D, Mangel M. 1999. Evolution of size-dependent flowering in Onopordum illyricum: a quantitative assessment of the role of stochastic selection pressures. American Naturalist 154: 628-651.
50. 2 and windspeed. Oecologia 108: 241-251.
51. Reynolds JF, Thornley JM. 1982. A shoot: root partitioning model. Annals of Botany 49: 585-597.
52. 2. Plant and Soil 187: 229-248.
53. 2 on flowering phenology and nectar production of nectar plants important for butterflies of calcareous grasslands. Oecologia 113: 341-349.
54. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 8.01. (on-Line Docs). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
55. Sauer JD. 1952. A geography of pokeweed. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 39: 113-125.
56. Saxe H, Cannell GR, Johnson O, Ryan MG, Vourlitis G. 2001. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytologist 149: 369-400.
57. 2. Oecologia 106: 93-99.
58. Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J. 2001. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. 2nd edn. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
59. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. New York, USA: W. H. Freeman.
60. Stearns SC, Koella JC. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40: 893-913.
61. 2 on seed provisioning, germination and seedling growth in Bromus erectus. Oecologia 123: 475-480.
62. Thornley JM. 1969. A model to describe the partitioning of photosynthate during vegetative growth. Annals of Botany 33: 419-430.
63. Wayne PM, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Seedling density modifies the growth responses of yellow birch maternal families to elevated carbon dioxide. Global Change Biology 1: 315-324.
64. 2-enriched atmosphere: consequence for size structure in regenerating birch stands. Journal of Ecology 85: 29-42.
65. 2. Journal of Ecology 87: 183-192.
66. Weiner J. 1988. The influence of competition on plant reproduction. In: Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L, eds. Plant reproduction ecology: patterns and strategies. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 228-245.
67. Wesselingh RA, Klinkhamer GL, De Jong TJ, Boorma LA. 1997. Threshold size for flowering in different habitats: effects of size-dependent growth and survival. Ecology 78: 2118-2132.
68. Wilson AD, Shure DJ. 1993. Plant competition and nutrient limitation during early succession in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. American Midland Naturalist 129: 1-9.
69. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.