Panoramic radiographs: A tool for investigating skeletal pattern

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 175-181

  Akcam, M Okan ^a   Altiok, Tunc ^a   Ozdiler, Erhan ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOGRAPHY; CEPHALOMETRY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTISTRY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOMETRY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; SKELETON; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CHILD; CHIN; FACIAL BONE; FORECASTING; IMAGE QUALITY; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NOSE; PALATE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MAXILLA; NOSE; PALATE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; STATISTICS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0037313510     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Graber TM, Brainerd FS. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1985. p.45.
2. Friedland B. Clinical radiological issues in orthodontic practice. Semin Orthod 1998;4:64-78.
3. Bruks A, Enberg K, Nordqvist I, Hansson AS, Jansson L, Svenson B. Radiographic examinations as an aid to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Swed Dent J 1999;23:77-85.
4. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:657-68.
5. Peltola JS, Kononen M, Nystrom M. A follow-up study of radiographic findings in the mandibular condyles of orthodontically treated patients and associations with TMD. J Dent Res 1995;74:1571-6.
6. Türp JC, Vach W, Harbich K, Alt KW, Strub JR. Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an orthopantomogram - a valid method? J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:395-400.
7. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Van Ooij CP, Hansson TL. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. 1. The factor of vertical magnification. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:475-80.
8. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Naeije M, Hansson TL. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. 2. The vertical symmetry. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:465-71.
9. Levandoski RR. Mandibular whiplash. Part I. An extension flexion injury of the temporomandibular joints. Funct Orthod 1993;10:26-9.
10. Piedra I. The Levandoski panoramic analysis in the diagnosis of facial and dental asymmetries. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995;20:15-21.
11. Wilson BB. Panoramic and transcranial radiology in orthodontics and craniomandibular disorders. J Gen Orthod 1996;7:12-20.
12. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Jimenez Lopez V, Hansson TL. The OPG: an aid in TMJ diagnostics. III. A comparison between lateral tomography and dental rotational panoramic radiography (orthopantomography). J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:401-6.
13. Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The clinical management of basic maxillofacial orthopedic appliances. Vol 3. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991. p. 416-28.
14. Kubota Y, Takenoshita Y, Takamori K, Kanamoto M, Shirasuna K. Levandoski pantographic analysis in the diagnosis of hyperplasia of the coronoid process. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37:409-11.
15. Catic A, Celebic A, Valentic-Peruzovic M, Catovic A, Jerolimov V, Muretic I, et al. Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:242-8.
16. Björk A. Zeitliche abstimmung interzeptiver kieferorthopeadischer massnahmen auf grundlage der reifestufen. Inf Kieferorthop 1977;4:281-93.
17. Altiok T. Investigation of cephalometric correction of incisors with conventional treatment planning considering articulator records [dissertation]. Ankara (Turkey) University, Health Sciences Institute; 1998.
18. Scarfe WC, Eraso FE, Farman AG. Characteristics of the orthopantomograph OP 100. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:51-7.
19. Farman TT, Kelly MS, Farman AG. The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:281-7.
20. Larheim TA, Svanaes DB. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:45-51.
21. Thanyakarn C, Hansen K, Rohlin M, Akesson L. Measurements of tooth length in panoramic radiographs. 1. The use of indicators. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:26-30.
22. Oktay H. The relation between image magnification of orthopantomograph and facial index. Ataturk Univ Dis Hek Derg 1987;2:25-30.
23. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984;86:449-69.
24. Björk A, Skieller V. Normales und anomales des unterkiefers. Inf Kieferorthop 1984;1:55-110.
25. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46.