Posterior corneal topographic changes after partial flap during laser in situ keratomileusis

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 160-162

  Sharma, N ^a   Rani, A ^a   Balasubramanya, R ^a   Vajpayee, Rasik B ^a   Pandey, R M ^b  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; PACHOMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THICKNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0037311157     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.2.160     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Shimmura S, Yang HY, Miyajima B, et al. Posterior corneal protrusion after PRK. Cornea 1997;16:686-8.
2. Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:1007-9.
3. Wang Z, Chan J, Yang B. Posterior-corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmology 1999;106:406-9; discussion 409-10.
4. Seitz B, Torres F, Langenbucher A, et al. Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:666-72; discussion 673.
5. Baek TM, Lee KH, Kagaya F, et al. Factors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2001;108:317-20.
6. Donnenfeld ED. Discussion. Ophthalmology 2001;108:673. Comment in: Ophthalmology 2001;108:666-72.
7. Busin M, Arffa RC, Zambianchi L, et al. Effect of hinged lamellar keratotomy on postkeratoplasty eyes. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1845-51; discussion 1851-2.
8. Dada T, Vajpayee RB, Gupta V, et al. Microkeratome-induced reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:507-8.
9. Wilson SE. LASIK: management of common complications. Cornea 1998;17:459-67.
10. Stulting RD, Balch K, Carr JD, et al. Complications of LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:S231.
11. Lin RT, Maloney RK. Flap complications associated with lamellar refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:129-36.
12. Maloney RK. Discussion. Ophthalmology 1999;106:409-10. Comment in: Ophthalmology 1999;106:406-9.
13. Quintela EH, Samapunphong S, Khan BF, et al. Posterior corneal surface changes after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1415-22.
14. Yaylali V, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW. Corneal thickness measurements with the Orbscan topography system and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1345-50.
15. Liu Z, Huang J, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:774-8.
16. Puliafito CA, Stern D, Krueger RR, et al. High-speed photography of excimer laser ablation of the cornea. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1255-9.
17. Krueger RR, Krasinski JS, Radzewicz C, et al. Photography of shock waves during excimer laser ablation of the cornea. Effect of helium gas on propogation velocity. Cornea 1993;12:300-34.
18. Krueger RR, Seiler T, Grucmnan T, et al. Stress wave amplitudes during laser surgery of the cornea. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1070-4.