Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiology

Lancet

Volumn 361, Issue 9355, 2003, Pages 359-360

  Rademakers, Frank E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; HEALTH CARE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; NOTE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STRESS; TECHNOLOGY; TREADMILL;

EID: 0037308526     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12440-3     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Wu E., Judd R.M., Vargas J.D., Klocke F.J., Bonow R.O., Kim R.J. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet. 357:2001;21-28.
2. Kim R.J., Wu E., Rafael A., et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 343:2000;1445-1453.
3. Al-Saadi N., Nagel E., Gross M., et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 101:2000;1379-1383.
4. Nagel E., Lehmkuhl H.B., Bocksch W., et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 99:1999;763-770.
5. Klein C., Nekolla S.G., Bengel F.M., et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 105:2002;162-167.
6. Ibrahim T., Nekolla S.G., Schreiber K., et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 39:2002;864-870.
7. Wahba F.F., Lamb H.J., Bax J.J., et al. Assessment of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening by gated 99Tcm-tetrofosmin SPECT: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 22:2001;663-671.
8. Bogaert J., Maes A., Van de Werf F., et al. Functional recovery of subepicardial myocardial tissue in transmural myocardial infarction after successful reperfusion: an important contribution to the improvement of regional and global left ventricular function. Circulation. 99:1999;36-43.
9. Panting J.R., Gatehouse P.D., Yang G.Z., et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 346:2002;1948-1953.
10. Schwitter J., Nanz D., Kneifel S., et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation. 103:2001;2230-2235.
11. Kim W.Y., Danias P.G., Stuber M., et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med. 345:2001;1863-1869.