Enhancement of the somatosensory N140 component during attentional training after stroke

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 329-335

  Giaquinto, Salvatore ^a   Fraioli, Lucia ^a  

^a Rome Cassino   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related potentials; Functional Independence Measure; Outcome; Stroke; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037305090     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00324-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bruyant P., Garcia-Larrea L., Mauguière F. Target side and scalp topography of the somatosensory P300. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 88:1993;468-477.
2. Castro-Alamancos M.A., Borrell J. Functional recovery of forelimb response capacity after forelimb primary motor cortex damage in the rat is due to the reorganization of adjacent areas of cortex. Neuroscience. 68:1995;793-805.
3. Cole J., Glees P. Effects of small lesions in sensory cortex of trained monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 17:1954;1-13.
4. Conforto A.B., Kaelin-Lang A., Cohen L.G. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol. 51:2002;122-125.
5. Cotman C.W., Berchtold N.C. Plasticity and growth factors in injury response. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 4:1998;223-230.
6. Dam M., Tonin P., Casson S., Ermani M., Pizzolato G., Iaia V., Battistin L. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke. 24:1993;1186-1191.
7. Desmedt J.E., Robertson D. Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral evoked somatosensory evoked potentials during forced-paced cognitive tasks in man. J Physiol (Lond). 271:1977;761-782.
8. Desmedt J.E., Tomberg C. Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 74:1989;321-346.
9. Dombovy M.L., Sandok B.A., Basford J.R. Rehabilitation for stroke: A review. Stroke. 17:1986;363-369.
10. Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke. 21:1990;1081-1085.
11. Ferrucci L., Bandinelli S., Guralnik J.M., Lamponi M., Bertini C., Falchini M., Baroni A. Recovery of functional status after stroke. A postrehabilitation follow-up study. Stroke. 24:1993;200-205.
12. Fraioli L., Giaquinto S., Valeriani M. Dipolar source modelling of the somatosensory P300 ERP. Clin Neurophysiol. 111:(suppl. 1):2000;S17.
13. Garcia-Larrea L., Bastuji H., Mauguière F. Mapping study of somatosensory evoked potentials during selective spatial attention. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 80:1991;201-214.
14. Garcia-Larrea L., Lukaszewicz A.C., Mauguière F. Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120-to-N140 transition. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;526-537.
15. Garraghty P.E., Muja N. NMDA receptors and plasticity in adult primate somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol. 367:1996;319-326.
16. Giaquinto S., Buzzelli S., Di Francesco L., Lottarini A., Montenero P., Tonin P., Nolfe G. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 100:1999;202-208.
17. Giaquinto S., Cobianchi A., Macera F., Nolfe G. EEG recordings in the course of recovery from stroke. Stroke. 25:1994;2204-2209.
18. Hallett M., Wassermann E.M., Cohen L.G., Chmielowska J., Gerloff C. Cortical mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 10:1998;131-142.
19. Harum K.H., Johnston M.V. Developmental neurobiology: New concepts in learning, memory, and neuronal development. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 4:1998;20-25.
20. Ito J. Somatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) in patients with different types of dementia. J Neurol Sci. 121:1994;139-146.
21. Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M. Reorganisation of neocortical representations after brain injury: A neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res. 71:1987;249-266.
22. Johansson B.B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke. 31:2000;223-230.
23. Jones T.A., Hawrylak N., Klintsova A.Y., Greenough W.T. Brain damage, behavior, rehabilitation, recovery, and brain plasticity. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 4:1998;231-237.
24. Josiassen R.C., Shagas C., Roemer R.A., Ercegovac D.E., Straumanis J.J. Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. Psychophysiology. 19:1982;146-159.
25. Kaas J.H. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 14:1991;137-167.
26. Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Visual field enlargement after computer training in brain damaged patients with homonymous deficits: An open pilot trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 8:1995;113-127.
27. Linacre J.M., Heinemann A.W., Wright B.D., Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 75:1994;127-132.
28. Naatanen R. Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull. 92:1982;605-640.
29. Neeper S.A., Gomez-Pinilla, Chol J., Cotman C. Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature. 373:1995;109.
30. Nudo R.J., Wise M., SiFuentes F., Milliken G.W. Neural substrates for the effects rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 272:1996;1791-1794.
31. Paolucci S., Grasso M.G., Antinucci G., Troise E., Morelli D., Coiro P., Bragoni M. One-year follow-up in stroke patients discharged from rehabilitation hospital. Cerebrovasc Dis. 10:2000;25-32.
32. Papanicolau A.C., Bartlett D.M., Gary H.E. Selective attention effects on evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci. 45:1989;277-282.
33. Polich J., Lardon M.T. P300 and long-term physical exercise. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 103:1997;493-498.
34. Pons T.P., Garraghty P.E., Mishkin M. Lesion-induced plasticity in the second somatosensory cortex of adult macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:1988;5279-5281.
35. Ridding M.C., McKay D.R., Thompson P.D., Miles T.S. Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 112:2001;1461-1469.
36. Rossini P.M., Pauri F. Neuromagnetic integrated methods tracking human brain mechanisms of sensorimotor areas 'plastic' reorganisation. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 33:2000;131-154.
37. Sanes J.N., Suner S., Donoghue J.P. Dynamic organization of primary motor cortex output to target muscles in adult rats. Exp Brain Res. 79:1990;479-491.
38. Stineman M.G., Maislin G., Fiedler R.C., Granger C.V. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke. 28:1997;550-556.
39. Valeriani M., Fraioli L., Ranghi F., Giaquinto S. Dipolar source modeling of the P300 event-related potential after somatosensory stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 24:2001;1677-1686.
40. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Edelstein L., Diels C., Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 54:2000;1938-1944.
41. Wall J.T. Variable organization in cortical maps of the skin as an indication of the lifelong adaptive capacities of circuits in the mammalian brain. Trends Neurosci. 12:1988;549-557.
42. Yamaguchi S., Knight R.T. Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. J Neurosci. 11:1991;2039-2054.
43. Yamaguchi S., Knight R.T. Effect of temporal-parietal lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 84:1992;139-148.
44. Zihl J., von Cramon D. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. Brain. 108:1985;335-365.