Imaging and anatomy of the normal intracranial venous system

Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-12

  Scott, James N ^a   Farb, Richard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN VEIN; CATHETERIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0037303691     PISSN: 10525149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1052-5149(02)00062-X     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Nurologic complications of cerebral angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401-7.
2. Spies JB, Berlin L. Complications of femoral artery puncture. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:9-11.
3. Casey SO, Alberico RA, Patel M, et al. Cerebral CT venography. Radiology 1996;198(1):163-70.
4. Ozsvath RR, Casey SO, Lustrin ES, et al. Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1699-707.
5. Chakeres DW, Schmalbrock P, Brogan M, et al. Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentate dimeglumine in enhanced 3-D MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:1107-18.
6. Creasy JL, Price RR, Presbrey T, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1990;175(1): 280-3.
7. Mattle HP, Wentz KU, Edelman RR, et al. Cerebral venography with MR. Radiology 1991;178(2):453-8.
8. Tsuruda JS, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ, et al. Dural sinus occlusion: evaluation with phase-sensitive gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12:481-8.
9. Yuh WTC, Simonson TM, Wang AM, et al. Venous sinus occlusive disease: MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:309-16.
10. Lewin JS, Masaryk TJ, Smith AS, et al. Time-of-flight intracranial MR venography: evaluation of the sequential oblique section technique. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:1657-64.
11. Liauw L, van Buchem MA, Spilt A, et al. MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. Radiology 2000;214(3):678-82.
12. Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PJ, et al. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:74-8.
13. Liang L, Korogi Y, Sugahara T, et al. Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:481-92.
14. Farb RJ, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR venography of the intracranial venous system using an auto-triggered elliptical centric ordered (ATECO) sequence: initial experience. Radiology 2003;206:203-9.
15. Tsuruda J, Saloner D, Norman D. Artifacts associated with MR neuroangiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13:1411-22.
16. Huston III J, Ehman RL. Comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR neuroangiographic techniques. Radiographics 1993;13(1):5-19.
17. Lee VS, Martin DJ, Krinsky GA, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:197-205.
18. Keller PJ. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1992;2(4):639-56.
19. Mitchell DG. Vascular techniques. In: MRI principles. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999. p. 237-48.
20. Pelc NJ, Alley MT, Listerud J, et al. Fundamentals of flow and hemodynamics. In: Atlas SW, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine, ed 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 118-22.
21. Dumoulin CL. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroimag Clin N Am 1992;2(4):657-76.
22. Turski P, Korosec F. Technical features and emerging clinical applications of phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroimag Clin N Am 1992;2(4): 785-800.
23. Stevenson J, Knoop EA, Litt AW. MP-RAGE subtraction venography: a new technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:239-41.
24. Davis CP, Hany TF, Wildermuth S, et al. Postprocessing techniques for gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiographics 1997;17(5):1061-77.
25. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptica centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography - initial assessment. Radiology 2001; 220(1):244-51.
26. Farb RI, Kim JK, Willinsky RA, et al. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula localization using a technique of real-time auto-triggered elliptical centric ordered 3D Gd-MRA: an initial assessment. Radiology 2002; 222(3):843-50.
27. Derbyshire JA, Kim JK, Farb RI, et al. Automated contrast bolus detection and triggered true centric 3D MPA of the carotid arteries [abstract 766]. In: Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley; 1998.
28. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6: 642-51.
29. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, et al. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997;205: 137-46.
30. Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, ter Brugge KG, et al. Intracranial venous system. In: Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, ter Brugge KG, editors. Surgical neuroangiography. ed 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p. 631-95.
31. Tüte U, Yaşargil MG, Al-Mefty O. The transcallosal-transforaminal approach to the third ventricle with regard to the venous variations in this region. J Neurosurg 1997;87:706-15.
32. Bisaria KK. Anatomic variations of venous sinuses in the region of the torcular Herophili. J Neurosurg 1985; 62:90-5.
33. Curé JK, Van Tassel P, Smith MT. Normal and variant anatomy of the dural venous sinuses. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 1994;15(6):499-519.
34. Mamourian AC, Towfighi J. MR of giant arachnoid granulations: a normal variant presenting as a mass within the dural venous sinus. Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:901-4.
35. Roche J, Warner D. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:677-83.
36. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, et al. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17: 1523-32.
37. Osbom AG. The cerebral veins. In: Diagnostic cerebral angiography. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 217-37.