Perspectives on utilitarian ethnopedology

Geoderma

Volumn 111, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 197-215

  Krasilnikov, Pavel V ^a   Tabor, Joe A ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethnoscience; Geospatial; Indigenous knowledge; Landscape ecology

Indexed keywords

INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; SOIL CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 0037303083     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00264-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Acres, B.D., 1984. Local farmers' experience of soils combined with reconnaissance soil survey for land use planning - an example from Tanzania. Soil Surv. Land Eval. 4 (3), 77-86.
2. Aubert, G., 1949. Note on the vernacular names of the soils of the Sudan and Senegal. Proc. First Commonw. Conf. on Trop. and Sub-Trop. Soils, Harpenter, 1948. Comm. Bureau Soil Sci., Techn. Comm., vol. 46, pp. 107-109.
3. Barrera-Bassols, N., Zinck, J.A., 2000. Ethnopedology in a Worldwide Perspective: An Annotated Bibliography. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Netherlands. 636 pp.
4. Behrens, C.A., 1989. The scientific basis for Shipobo soil classification and land use: changes in soil-plant associations with cash cropping. Am. Anthropol. 91 (1), 83-100.
5. Bennett, H.H., Allison, R.V., 1928. The Soils of Cuba. Trop. Plant Res. Found., Washington. 410 pp.
6. Bradley, P.N., 1983. Peasants, soils, and classification: an investigation into a vernacular soil typology from the Guidimaka of Mauritania. Res. Ser. No. 14, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne. 106 pp.
7. Butzer, K.W., 1993. The classical tradition of agronomic sciences: perspectives on carolingian agriculture and agronomy. In: Butzer, P.L., Lohrmann, D. (Eds.), Science in Western and Eastern Civilization in Carolingian Times. Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston, pp. 539-596.
8. Calton, W.E., 1949. A reconnaissance of the soils of Zanzibar protectorate. Proc. First Commonw. Conf. on Trop. and Sub-Trop. Soils, Harpenter, 1948. Comm. Bureau Soil Sci., Techn. Comm., vol. 46, pp. 49-53.
9. Conklin, H.C., 1954. An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 7 (2), 133-142.
10. Dames, Moore, 1990. Atlas Volume 1, Annexe E. Plan Directeur de Développement de la Haute Valiée du Fleuve Sénégal. Organisation pour la Mise en Valeur du fleuve Sénégal, Dakar/USAID/Dames and Moore Ltd., Paris. p. 20-D-02 soils and land tenure.
11. Dialla, B.E., 1993. The mossi indigenous soil classification in Burkina Faso. Indig. Knowl. Dev. Monit. 1 (3), 1-5.
12. Dokuchaev, V.V., 1949. Russian chernozem. Complete Collection of Works, vol. 3. The Acad. of Sci. of the USSR Publ. House, Moscow, pp. 378-404. In Russian.
13. Dokuchaev, V.V., 1953. The advantage of studying the local terminology of Russian soils. Complete Collection of Works, vol. 7. The Acad. of Sci. of the USSR Publ. House, Moscow, pp. 332-340. In Russian.
14. Finkl, C.W. (Ed.), 1982. Soil Classification. Hutchinson Ross Publ., Stroudsburg, PA. 391 pp.
15. Gavrilyuk, F.Y., 1963. Field Investigation and Mapping of Soils. Vyshaya Shkola, Moscow. 235 pp., in Russian.
16. Heiser Jr., C.B., 1990. Seed to Civilization: The Story of Food. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Hewitt, A.E., 1992. Soil classification in New Zealand: legacy and lessons. Aust. J. Soil Res. 30, 843-854.
18. Hilgard, E.W., 1930. Soils, their Formation, Properties, Composition, and Relation to Climate and Plant Growth in the Humid and Arid Regions. Macmillan, New York. 593 pp.
19. Hobbs, R., 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 37, 1-9.
20. Hunn, E., 1982. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. Am. Anthropol. 84, 830-847.
21. Jenny, H., 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Kerven, C., Dolva, H., Renna, R., 1995. Indigenous soil classification systems in Northern Zambia. In: Warren, D.M., Slikkerveer, L.J., Brokensha, D. (Eds.), The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems. Intermed. Technol. Publ., London, pp. 82-87.
23. Kirby, W.F., Translator. 1923. Kalevala, vol. 1. J.M. Dent & Sons, London. 327 pp.
24. Krupenikov, I.A., 1981. The History of Soil Science. Nauka, Moscow. 327 pp., in Russian.
25. Kubiëna, W.L., 1953. Bestimmungsbuch und Systematic der Boden Europas. Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart. 392 pp.
26. Lamansky, V.V., 1915. An attempt for folk soil dictionary. Pochvovedenie 2, 61-72. In Russian.
27. Marten, G.G., Vityakon, P., 1986. Soil management in traditional agriculture. In: Marten, G.G. (Ed.), Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 199-225.
28. Militarev, V.Y., 1993. Categories and principles of the natural-science classification theory. Theory and Methods of Biological Classifications. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 101-115. In Russian.
29. Nyamaphene, K.W., 1983. Traditional systems of soil classification in Zimbabwe. Zambezia 11 (1), 55-57.
30. Ollier, C.D., Drover, D.P., Godelier, M., 1971. Soil knowledge amongst the Baruya of Wonenara, New Guinea. Oceania 42 (1), 33-41.
31. Osunade, M.A.A., 1988. Soil suitability classification by small farmers. Prof. Geogr. 40 (2), 194-201.
32. Pawluk, R., Norton, J., 1997. Personal communication. Zuni Conserv. Project, Pueblo of Zuni, P.O. Box 339, Zuni, NM 87327-0339, USA.
33. Ping-Hua Lee, M., 1921. The economic history of China with special reference to agriculture. Columbia University Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law 99, 1-461.
34. Raychaudhri, S.P., 1958. Soils of India. Rev. Ser., vol. 25. The Indian Counc. Agric. Res., Delhi. 28 pp.
35. Sandor, J.A., Furbee, L., 1996. Indigenous knowledge and classification of soils in the Andes of Southern Peru. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60 (5), 1502-1512.
36. Sedov, S.N., 1999. Personal Communication. Department of Geology, UNAM, Mexico. sergey@geol-sun.igeol-cu.unam.mx.
37. Shoba, S.A. (Ed.), 2002. Soil Terminology and Correlation, 2nd ed. Karelian Research Centre RAS Publ., Petrozavodsk. 294 p.
38. Sillitoe, P., 1993. Local awareness of the soil environment in the Papua New Guinea highlands. In: Milton, K. (Ed.), Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology. Routledge, New York, pp. 160-173.
39. Stransky, I., 1954. Folk soil names based on color and moistening degree. Proc. of Soil Sci. Inst. Sofia. Bulg. Acad. of Sci. Publ. House, vol. 2, pp. 281-360. In Bulgarian.
40. Stransky, I., 1956. Folk soil names based on physical properties. Proc. of Soil Sci. Inst. Sofia. Bulg. Acad. of Sci. Publ. House, Sofia, vol. 3, pp. 329-410. In Bulgarian.
41. Stransky, I., 1957. Folk soil names based on various features. Proc. of Soil Sci. Inst. Sofia. Bulg. Acad. of Sci. Publ. House, Sofia, vol. 4, pp. 307-409. In Bulgarian.
42. Tabor, J.A., 1988. Soils and Soil Management in the Maïssade Commune of Haiti. USAID/Save the Children Federation, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, p. 126.
43. Tabor, J.A., 1993. Soils of the lower, middle and upper Senegal River Valley. In: Park, T.K. (Ed.), Risk and Tenure in Arid Lands. The political ecology of development in the Senegal River Basin. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 31-50.
44. Tabor, J.A., 1995. Improving crop yields in the Sahel through water-harvesting. J. Arid Environ. 30, 83-106.
45. Tabor, J.A., 1997. Soil classification systems. Soils of Arid Regions of the U.S. and Israel. Office of Arid Lands Studies, The University of Arizona, Tucson. http://ag.arizona.edu/OALS/IALC/soils/classifsystems.html.
46. Tabor, J.A., Ba, D., 1987. Soils and Soil Management for Agriculture, Forestry, and Range in Mauritania. Farming Systems Research Along the Senegal River Valley: Report No. 7. USAID/The University of Arizona, Office of Arid Lands Studies, Tucson, AZ. 105 pp.
47. Tabor, J.A., Hutchinson, C.F., 1994. Using indigenous knowledge, remote sensing, and GIS for sustainable development. Indig. Knowl. Dev. Monit. 2 (1), 2-6.
48. Tabor, J.A., Kilambya, D.W., Kibe, J.M., 1990. Reconnaissance Survey of the Ethnopedology in the Embu, Meru, Machakos, and Kitui Districts of Kenya's Eastern Province. USAID/University of Missouri, Columbia. 85 pp.
49. Tabor, J.A., Watson, A., Diagne, A., Ibrahima, K., Daffe, M., Dieme, M., Khouma, M., 1993. Annexe du sols. Plan Directeur de Développement de la Haute Valiée du Fleuve Sénégal. Organisation pour la Mise en Valeur du fleuve Sénégal, Dakar/USAID/Dames and Moore, Paris. 91 pp., data base on diskettes, 1:50,000 and 1:20,000 maps.
50. USDA-NRCS, publication pending. Soil Survey of McKinley County Area. USDA Nat. Resour. Conserv. Serv., Washington, DC.
51. Warren, D.M., 1992. A preliminary analysis of indigenous soil classification and management systems in four ecozones of Nigeria. Discussion Paper RCMD 92/1. Int. Inst. of Trop. Agric., Ibadan and the Afr. Resour. Cent. for Indig. Knowl., 28 pp.
52. Wilde, S.A., 1953. Soil science and semantics. J. Soil Sci. 4 (4), 1-4.
53. Williams, B.J., 1975. Aztec soil science. Bol. Inst. Geogr. 7, 115-120.
54. Williams, B.J., Ortiz-Solorio, C.A., 1981. Middle American folk soil taxonomy. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 71 (3), 335-358.
55. Zaharov, S.A., 1915. On soil terminology of the native population in the Transcaucasian region. Russ. Pochvoved 13-14, 367-373.
56. Zimmerer, K.S., 1994. Local soil knowledge: answering basic questions in highland Bolivia. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49 (1), 29-34.
57. Zitong, G. (Ed.), 1994. Chinese soil taxonomic classification (Draft). Inst. of Soil Sci. Academia Sinica, Nanjing. 93 pp.