Effects of oviductal and cumulus cells on in vitro fertilization and embryo development of porcine oocytes fertilized with epididymal spermatozoa

Theriogenology

Volumn 59, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 975-986

  Romar, R ^a   Coy, P ^a   Ruiz, S ^a   Gadea, J ^a   Rath, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b Institute of Animal Science and Animal Behaviour   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cumulus cells; IVF; Oocyte; Oviductal cells; Pig; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; EPIDIDYMIS; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; MALE; OOCYTE; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVIDUCT; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPERMATOZOON; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CULTURE MEDIA; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; EPIDIDYMIS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; MALE; OOCYTES; OVARIAN FOLLICLE; OVIDUCTS; SPERM-OVUM INTERACTIONS; SPERMATOZOA; SWINE;

SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0037302583     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01138-X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ayoub MA, Hunter AG. Parthenogenetic activation of in vitro matured bovine oocytes. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:421-9.
2. Campos I, Coy P, Romar R, Ruiz S, Gadea J. Effects of maturational stage, cumulus cells and coincubation of mature and immature cumulus-oocyte complexes on in vitro penetrability of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 2001;55:1489-500.
3. Chian RC, Sirard MA. Fertilizing ability of bovine spermatozoa cocultured with oviduct epithelial cells. Biol Reprod 1995;52:156-62.
4. Cox CI, Leese HJ. Retention of functional characteristics by bovine oviduct and uterine epithelia in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 1997;46:169-78.
5. Dubuc A, Sirard MA. Effect of coculturing spermatozoa with oviductal cells on the incidence of polyspermy in pig in vitro fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 1995;41:360-7.
6. Dubuc A, Sirard MA. Effects of steroids and oviductal cells, from the different parts of the oviduct, on the incidence of monospermy in porcine in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 1996;46:449-59.
7. Fazeli A, Duncan AE, Watson PF, Holt WV. Sperm-oviduct interaction: induction of capacitation and preferential binding of uncapacitated spermatozoa to oviductal epithelial cells in porcine species. Biol Reprod 1999;60:879-86.
8. Funahashi H, Day BN. Effects of the duration of exposure to supplemental hormones on cytoplasmic maturation of pig oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993;98:179-85.
9. Funahashi H, Day BN. Advances in in vitro production of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997;52:271-83.
10. Ka H-H, Sawai K, Wang W-H, Im K-S, Niwa K. Amino acids in maturation media and presence of cumulus cells at fertilization promote male pronuclear formation in porcine oocytes matured and penetrated in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997;57:1478-83.
11. Kano K, Miyano T, Kato S. Effect of oviductal epithelial cells on fertilization of pig oocytes in vitro. Theriogenology 1994;42:1061-8.
12. Kikuchi K, Nagai T, Motlik J, Shioya Y, Izake Y. Effect of follicle cells on in vitro fertilization of pig follicular oocytes. Theriogenology 1993;39:593-9.
13. Kim NH, Funahashi H, Abeydeera LR, Moon SJ, Prather RS, Day BN. Effects of oviductal fluid on sperm penetration and cortical granule exocytosis during fertilization of pig oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1996;107:79-86.
14. Kouba AJ, Abeydeera LR, Alvarez IM, Day BN, Buhi WC. Effects of the porcine oviduct-specific glycoprotein on fertilization, polyspermy and embryonic development in vitro. Biol Reprod 2000;63:242-50.
15. Macháty Z, Day BN, Prather RS. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1998;59:451-5.
16. Mattioli M, Galeati G, Seren E. Effect of follicle somatic cells during pig oocyte maturation on egg penetrability and male pronucleus formation. Gamete Res 1988;20:177-83.
17. Mattioli M, Lucidi P, Barboni B. Expanded cumuli induce acrosome reaction in boar sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 1998;51:445-53.
18. Nagai T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, Shioya Y, Kuwayama M, Fukushima M, et al. In vitro fertilization of pig oocytes by frozen boar spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1988;84:585-91.
19. Nagai T, Moor RM. Effect of oviduct cells on the incidence of polyspermy in pig eggs fertilized in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1990;26:377-82.
20. Ouhibi N, Benet G, Menezo Y. Fetal bovine oviduct epithelial cell monolayers: method of culture and identification. J Tissue Cult Methods 1991;13:289-94.
21. Park CK, Sirard MA. The effect of preincubation of frozen-thawed spermatozoa with oviductal cells on the in vitro penetration of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 1996;46:1181-9.
22. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993;48:61-73.
23. Rath D, Niemann H, Tao T. In vitro maturation of porcine oocytes in follicular fluid with subsequent effects on fertilization and embryo yield in vitro. Theriogenology 1995;44:529-38.
24. Rath D, Niemann H, Torres CRL. In vitro development to blastocysts of early porcine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Theriogenology 1995;547:785-93.
25. Rath D, Niemann H. In vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes with fresh and frozen-thawed ejaculated or frozen-thawed epididymal semen obtained from identical boars. Theriogenology 1997;47:785-93.
26. Rath D, Long CR, Dobrinsky JR, Welch GR, Schreier LL, Johnson LA. In vitro production of sexed embryos for gender preselection: high-speed sorting of X-chromosome bearing sperm to produce pigs after embryo transfer. J Anim Sci 1999;77:3346-52.
27. Reischl J, Prelle K, Schöl H, Neumüller C, Einspanier R, Sinowatz F, et al. Factors affecting proliferation and dedifferentiation of primary bovine oviduct epithelial cells in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 1999;296:371-83.
28. Romar R, Coy P, Campos I, Gadea J, Matás C, Ruiz S. Effect of co-culture of porcine sperm and oocytes with porcine oviductal epithelial cells on in vitro fertilization. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;68:85-98.
29. Suarez SS, Redfern K, Raynor P, Martin F, Phillips DM. Attachment of boar spermatozoa to mucosal explants of oviduct in vitro: possible role in formation of a sperm reservoir. Biol Reprod 1991;44:998-1004.
30. Techakumphu M, Srianan W. Can oviductal epithelial cells suspension support in vitro development of pig embryos? 13th IPVS Congress, Bangkok, Thailand; 1994, p. 412.
31. Thibodeaux JK, Myers MW, Goodeaux LL, Menezo Y, Roussel JD, Broussard JR. et al. Evaluating an in vitro culture system of bovine uterine and oviduct epithelial cells for subsequent embryo co-culture. Reprod Fertil Dev 1992;4:573-83.
32. Vatzias G, Hagen DR. Effects of porcine follicular fluid and oviduct-conditioned media on maturation and fertilization of porcine oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 1999;60:42-8.
33. Walter I. Culture of bovine oviduct epithelial cells BOEC. Anat Rec 1995;243:347-56.
34. Wang WH, Niwa KY, Okuda K. In-vitro penetration of pig oocytes matured in culture by frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1991;93:491-6.
35. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Okuda K, Niwa K. Penetration of porcine oocytes during maturation in vitro by cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1994;50:510-5.
36. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Fraser LRY, Niwa K. Functional analysis using chlortetracycline fluorescence and in vitro fertilization of frozen-thawed ejaculated boar spermatozoa incubated in a protein-free chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil 1995;104:305-13.
37. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Han Y-H, Prather RSY, Day BN. Morphologic evaluation and actin filament distribution in porcine embryos produced in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1999;60:1020-8.