Interfacial properties and microfailure degradation mechanisms of bioabsorbable fibers/poly-L-lactide composites using micromechanical test and nondestructive acoustic emission

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 403-419

  Park, Joung Man ^a   Kim, Dae Sik ^a   Kim, Sung Ryong ^b  

^a Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

^b Samyang Corporation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

B. Interfacial shear strength; Bioabsorbable composites; D. Acoustic emission; Degradation; Microfailure mechanisms

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; DEGRADATION; GLASS FIBERS; HYDROLYSIS; POLYESTERS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

BIOABSORBABLE COMPOSITES;

COMPOSITE MICROMECHANICS;

ABSORPTION; CHITOSAN FIBER; DEGRADATION; FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; GLASS FIBER; IMPLANT; INTERFACIAL PROPERTY; POLYLACTIC ACID; TENSILE PROPERTY;

EID: 0037300812     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00212-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Böstman OM, Makela EA, Törmälä P, Rokkanen P. Transphyseal fracture .xation using biodegradable pin in internal fixation of fracture in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71B:706-7.
2. Böstman OM, Makela EA, Sodergard J, Hirvensalo E, Törmälä P, Rokkanen P. Absorbable polyglycolide pins in internal fixation of fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:242-5.
3. Böstman OM. Intense granulomatous of an avoiding implant removals after fracture .xation by using absorbable devices. Scand J Soc Med 1992;22:41-5.
4. Böstman OM, Matallic or absorbable fracture fixation devices A. cost minimization analysis. Clin Orthop 1996;329:233-9.
5. Sinibaldik K, Rosen H, Lin SK, De Angelis M. Temors associated with metallic implants in animals. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1976;118:257-66.
6. Martin A, Bauer TW, Manley MT, Marks KE. Osteosarcoma at the site of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70-A: 1561-7.
7. Thomson RC, Yaszemski MJ, Powers JM, Mikos AG. Hydroxyapatite fiber reinforced poly(a-hydroxy ester) foams for bone regeneration. Biometer 1998;19:1935-43.
8. Furukawa T, Matsusue Y, Yasunaga T, Shikinami Y, Okuno M, Nakamura T. Biodegradation behavior of ultra-high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(L-lactide) composite rods for internal fixation of bone fractures. Biometer 2000;21:889-98.
9. SlivkaMA, Chu CC, Adisaputro IA. Fiber-matrix interface studies on bioabsorbable composite materials for internal fixation of bone fractures: I. Raw material evaluation and measurement of fibermatrix interfacial adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:469-77.
10. Slivka MA, Chu CC. Fiber-matrix interface studies on bioabsorbable composite materials for internal fixation of bone fractures: II. A new method using laser scanning confocal microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:353-62.
11. Andriano KP, Wenger KH, Daniels AU, Heller J. Technical note: Biomechanical analysis of two absorbable fracture fixation pins after long-term canine implantation. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:528-33.
12. Nijenhuis AJ, Colstee E, Grijpma DW, Pennings AJ. High molecular weight poly(L-lactide) and poly(ethylene-oxide) blends: thermal characterization and physical properties. Polym 1996;37:5849-57.
13. Park JM, Subramanian RV. Interfacial shear strength durability improvement by monomeric polymeric silanes in basalt fiber/epoxy single-filament composite specimens. J Adhesion Sci Tech 1991;5:459-77.
14. Drzal LT. The effect of polymeric matrix mechanical properties on the fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength. Mater Sci Eng 1990;21:289-93.
15. Marshall DB, Cox BN, Evans AG. The mechanics of matrix cracking in brittle-matrix fiber composite. Acta Metall 1985;31:2013-21.
16. Kelly A, Tyson WR. Tensile properties of fiber reinforced metals: copper/tungsten copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids 1965;13:329-50.
17. Lee SM, Holguin S. A new single fiber/resin interface test for highly cross-linked resin systems. J Adhesion 1990;31:91-101.
18. Favre JP, Jacques D. Stress transfer by shear in carbon fiber model composites: part 1. Results of single-fiber fragmentation tests with thermosetting resins. J Mater Sci 1990;25:1373-80.
19. Lee SI, Park JM, Shin DW, Yoon DJ. Interfacial properties of glass fiber/brittle-ductile dual matrix composites using micromechanical techniques and acoustic emission. Polym Comp 1999;20:19-28.
20. Ageorges C, Friedrich K, Schüller T, Lauke B. Single fiber Broutman test: Fiber-matrix interface transverse debonding. Comp Part A 1999;30:1423-34.
21. Wood JR, Wagner HD, Marom G. The compressive fragmentation phenomenon: Using microcomposites to evaluate thermal stress, single fibre compressive strengths, Weibull parameters and interfacial shear strength. Proc Royal Soc London 1996;452:235- 52.
22. Wood JR, Marom G. Determining the interfacial shear strength in the presence of transcrystallinity in composite by the single- fiber microcomposites compressive fragmentation test. Appl Comp Mater 1997;4:117-24.
23. Park JM, Chong EM, Yoon DJ, Lee JH. Interfacial properties of two SiC fiber-reinforced polycarbonate composite using the fragmentation test and acoustic emission. Polym Comp 1998;19:747-57.
24. Verma RK, Kander RG, Hsiao BS. Acoustic emission monitoring of damage using high amplitude gains in carbon fiber reinforced poly(etheretherketone). J Mater Sci Lett 1994;13:438-42.
25. Ma BT, Schadler LS, Laird C, Figueroa JC. Acoustic emission in single filament carbon/polycarbonate kevlar/polycarbonate composite under tensile deformation. Polym Comp 1990;11:211-6.
26. Jung TW, Subramanian RV, Manoranjan VS. Prediction of fiber strength at the critical length: a simulation theory and experimental verification for bimodally distributed carbon fibre strengths. J Mater Sci 1993;28:4489-96.
27. Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Koeng MF, Lloyd PF. Adhesion of graphite fibers to epoxy matrices. J Adhesion 1983;16:133-52.
28. Wu HF, Netravali AN. Weibull analysis of strength-length relationships in single Nicalon SiC fibres. J Mater Sci 1992;27:3318-24.
29. Park JM, Kim JH. Surface energies of borosilicate glass surfaces modified with n-alkyl silane coupling agents via dynamic contact angle measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 1994;168:103-10.
30. Zisman WA. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Fowkes FM, editor. Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion. Adv Chem Ser 1964;43:1-51.
31. Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969;13:1741-7.
32. Park JM, Shin WG, Yoon DJ. A study of interfacial aspects of epoxy-based composites reinforced with dual basalt and SiC fibers by means of the fragmentation and acoustic emission techniques. Comp Sci Tech 1999;59:355-70.
33. Chu CC. Bioabsorbable suture materials: Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting biodegradation phenomena. In: Wise DL, editor. Encyclopedic handbook of biomaterials and bioengineering, part A. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995.
34. Park JM, Kim DS. The in.uence of crytallinity on interfacial properties of carbon and SiC two-.ber/polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites. Polym Comp 2000;21:789-97.
35. Andrade JD, Smith LM, Gregonis DE. The contact angle and interface energetics. In: Andrade JD, editor. New York: Plenum Press; 1983.
36. Kline R. Acoustic emission signal characterization. In: Matthews JR, editor. Acoustic emission. New York Gordon Breach; 1983.
37. Park JM, Kim YM, Kim KW, Yoon DJ, Interfacial aspects of electrodeposited carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites using monomeric polymeric coupling agents. J Colloid Interface Sci 2000;231:114-28.