Evaluation of an Internet-based database on infectious disorders during pregnancy: INFPREG

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 116-119

  Petersson, Karin ^a   Forsgren, Marianne ^a   Sjödini, Marie ^a   Kublickas, Marius ^a   Westgren, Magnus ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Infectious disorders in pregnancy; INFPREG; Internet; Midwives in antenatal care; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFECTION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MIDWIFE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY DISORDER; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SWEDEN;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; MIDWIFERY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS; PRENATAL CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 0037300808     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00050.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rigby M, Forsstrom J, Roberts R, Wyatt J. Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services. Br Med J 2001; 323: 552-6.
2. Berglund A, Lindmark G. The usefulness of initial risk assessment as a predictor of pregnancy complications and premature delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 871-6.
3. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Publishing criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. Br Med J 1999; 318: 647-9.
4. Delamothe T. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. Br Med J 2000; 321: 843-4.
5. Risk A, Dzenowagis J. Review of Internet health information quality initiatives. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3: e28 (www.jmir.org/2001/4/e28).
6. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. JAMA 2000; 283: 1600-6.
7. Bellman E. INFPREG välbesökt databas om infektioner under graviditet. Lakartidningen 1999; 41: 4402-3.
8. Forsgren M. Infektioner hos gravida kvinnor, foster och nyfödda barn. Lakartidningen 2002; 5: 392-6.
9. Georgsson S. INFPREG-databasen för snabba svar om infektioner under graviditet. Jordemodern 2000; 9: 17-8.
10. Wyatt JC. Knowledge and the Internet. J Roy Soc Med 2000; 93: 565-70x.
11. Jadad AR. Internet use among physicians, nurses and their patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1451-2.
12. Nylenna M, Hjortdahl P, Aasland OG. Internett-Gruk bland norske leger. Tidssk Nor Laegeforen 1999; 119: 4342-4.
13. Im EO, Chee W. A feminist critique on the use of Internet in nursing research. Adv Nurse Sci 2001; 23: 67-82.
14. Engelhardt F. Focus 97. Master Thesis. Stockholm: School of Business, Stockholm University, 1997.
15. Österman T, Timander J. Internetandvändningen I Sveriges Befolkning. Teldok, 115, Telia, Sweden, 1997.
16. Werbach K. Syndication - the emerging model for business on the Internet. Harv Bus Rev 2000; 78: 84-93.