Valence quarks in the QCD plasma: Quark number susceptibilities and screening

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Gavai, Rajiv V ^a   Gupta, Sourendu ^a  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; GAS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; SCREENING;

EID: 0037300140     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.034501     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. G. Boyd, Nucl. Phys. B469, 419 (1996).
2. S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034507 (2001).
3. C. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6861 (1997);
4. J. Engels, Phys. Lett. B 396, 210 (1997);
5. A. Ali Khan, Phys. Rev. D 63, 034502 (2001);
6. Phys. Rev. DA. Ali Khan64, 074510 (2001).
7. J.O. Andersen, E. Braaten, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 61, 014017 (2000);
8. Phys. Rev. DJ.O. AndersenE. BraatenM. Strickland61, 074016 (2000);
9. Phys. Rev. DJ.O. Andersen, 66, 085016 (2002).
10. R. Parwani, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054014 (2001);
11. Phys. Rev. DR. Parwani64, 025002 (2001).
12. J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2906 (1999);
13. J.-P. BlaizotE. IancuA. RebhanPhys. Rev. D 63, 065003 (2001).
14. K. Kajantie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 10 (2001).
15. S. Datta and S. Gupta, Nucl. Phys. B534, 392 (1998);
16. S. DattaS. Guptahep-ph/9809382;
17. S. Datta and S. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 471, 382 (2000).
18. A. Hart, M. Laine, and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B586, 443 (2000).
19. S. Datta and S. Gupta, hep-lat/0208001.
20. R.V. Gavai and S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074506 (2001).
21. R.V. Gavai, S. Gupta, and P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054506 (2002).
22. S. Gottlieb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2247 (1987).
23. R.V. Gavai, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2743 (1989);
24. Phys. Rev. DC. Bernard, 54, 4585 (1996);
25. Phys. Rev. DS. Gottlieb, 55, 6852 (1997).
26. R.V. Gavai and S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094515 (2002).
27. C. Bernard, hep-lat/0209079.
28. M. Asakawa, U. Heinz, and B. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2072 (2000);
29. Phys. Rev. Lett.S. Jeon and V. Koch, 85, 2076 (2000);
30. D. Bower and S. Gavin, Phys. Rev. C 64, 051902(R) (2001);
31. S. Jeon, V. Koch, K. Redlich, and X.N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A697, 546 (2002).
32. Z. Fodor and S.D. Katz, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 014 (2002);
33. C.R. Allton, Phys. Rev. D 66, 074507 (2002);
34. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B642, 290 (2002);
35. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, hep-lat/0205022.
36. J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Lett. B 523, 143 (2001).
37. C. DeTar and J.B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 399 (1987);
38. Phys. Rev. Lett.K.D. Born, 67, 302 (1991).
39. S. Gottlieb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1881 (1987);
40. C. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D 45, 3854 (1992);
41. Phys. Rev. DS. Gottlieb, 47, 3619 (1993).
42. A. Gocksch, P. Rossi, and U. Heller, Phys. Lett. B 205, 334 (1988).
43. S. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 288, 171 (1992).
44. G. Boyd, S. Gupta, and F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. B385, 482 (1992);
45. G. Boyd, Z. Phys. C 64, 331 (1994);
46. G. BoydPhys. Lett. B 349, 170 (1995).
47. R.V. Gavai, S. Gupta, and R. Lacaze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094504 (2002).
48. T. Hashimoto, A. Nakamura, and I.O. Stamatescu, Nucl. Phys. B406, 325 (1993);
49. P. de Forcrand, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054501 (2001);
50. E. Laermann and S. Schmidt, Eur. Phys. J. C 20, 541 (2001).
51. S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094505 (1999).
52. S. Naik, Nucl. Phys. B316, 238 (1989).
53. K. Symanzik, Nucl. Phys. B226, 187 (1983).
54. P. Hasenfratz and F. Karsch, Phys. Lett. 125B, 308 (1983);
55. N. Bilic and R.V. Gavai, Z. Phys. C 23, 77 (1984);
56. R.V. Gavai, Phys. Rev. D 32, 519 (1985).
57. R.V. Gavai and S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3784 (1999).
58. R.V. Gavai, hep-lat/0209008.
59. A. Wroblewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 16, 379 (1985).
60. J. Cleymans, hep-lat/0201142.
61. Here (Formula presented) is the polarization (Formula presented) of the (Formula presented) vector operator and (Formula presented) is the polarization (Formula presented) of the (Formula presented) axial vector.
62. Equally good fits are obtained to the form (Formula presented)
63. Since the study in Ref. 15 used only (Formula presented) the extrapolation of (Formula presented) led to strong underestimation of the continuum limit. Since the extrapolation affected (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) in the same way, the results for the Wroblewski parameter (Formula presented) were almost unaffected, as this work verifies. The results for (Formula presented) were unrelated, and hence unaffected.