What can we learn from a measurement of sin(2β+γ)?

Physical Review D

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Silva, João P ^a,b   Soffer, Abner ^c   Wolfenstein, Lincoln ^d   Wu, Feng ^d  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE ENGENHARIA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; PHYSICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

EID: 0037299130     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.036004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963);
2. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
3. BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 201802 (2002).
4. Belle Collaboration, K. Abe et al., hep-ex/0207098.
5. M. Gronau and D. London, Phys. Lett. B 253, 483 (1991).
6. G. C. Branco, L. Lavoura, and J. P. Silva, CP Violation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
7. d→D decay was first pointed out in C.C. Meca and J.P. Silva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1377 (1998).
8. Extensive studies appear in A. Amorim, M.G. Santos, and J.P. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 59, 056001 (1999);
9. J.P. Silva and A. Soffer, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 61, 112001 (2000).
10. B. Kayser and D. London, Phys. Rev. D 61, 116013 (2000).
11. See also D. Atwood and A. Soni, hep-ph/0206045.
12. I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett. B 427, 179 (1998).
13. D. London, N. Sinha, and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1807 (2000).
14. M. Diehl and G. Hiller, Phys. Lett. B 517, 125 (2001).
15. See, however, the following papers that call into question the value commonly used for the SU(3) breaking parameter: C. Bernard, T. Blum, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 58, 014501 (1998);
16. D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Lett. B 508, 17 (2001);
17. A.S. Kronfeld and S.M. Ryan, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 543, 59 (2002).
18. A. Ali and D. London, in the Proceedings of 3rd Workshop on Physics and Detectors for DAPHNE (DAPHNE 99), Italy, 1999, DESY preprint number DESY-00-026, hep-ph/0002167.
19. A. Höcker, H. Lacker, S. Laplace, and F. Le Diberder, Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 225 (2001); hep-ph/0112295.
20. L. Wolfenstein and F. Wu, Europhys. Lett. 58, 49 (2002).
21. K) 102 of Ref. [5].
22. C. Voena and W. A. Walkowiak (private communication). The results of these studies predict an error for sin(2β+γ) which is roughly twice the error estimated in The BaBar Physics Book, edited by P. F. Harrison and H. R. Quinn (SLAC, Stanford, 1998).
23. R. Aleksan, I. Dunietz, B. Kayser, and F. Le Diberder, Nucl. Phys. B361, 141 (1991).
24. See A. Soffer, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054032 (1999)
25. for the corresponding ambiguities in the methods of the following references: M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 265, 172 (1991);
26. D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3257 (1997).
27. See also Ref. [5].
28. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999);
29. Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000).
30. J.D. Bjorken, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 11, 325 (1989).
31. CLEO Collaboration, S. Ahmed et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 031101(R) (2002).
32. UKQCD Collaboration, L. Lellouch and C.J. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094501 (2001).
33. See also Ref. [12].
34. K. Anikeev et al., "B Physics at the Tevatron: Run II and Beyond," FERMILAB-Pub-01/197, http://www-theory.lbl.gov/Brun2/report/, hep-ph/0201071.
35. This general approach was shown graphically in T. Goto, T. Nihei, and Y. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5233 (1996);
36. T. Goto, T. Nihei, and Y. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5904 (1996).
37. 2φ+sin 2φ δγ, as it had to be. Clearly, the term linear in δγ vanishes whenever sin φ∼1 (cos φ∼0).