Haplotypic QTL mapping in an outbred pedigree

Genetical Research

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 43-50

  Gwaze, David P ^a   Zhou, Yi ^a,c   Reyes Valdés, M Humberto ^b   Al Rababah, Mohammad A ^a   Williams, Claire G ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO   (Mexico)

^c Cereal Research Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FLANKING REGION; FOUNDER EFFECT; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GROWTH CURVE; GROWTH RATE; HAPLOTYPE; HEIGHT; INHERITANCE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; NONHUMAN; OUTBRED STRAIN; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PINE; PLANT GROWTH; PROBABILITY; PROGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; REVIEW; SIMULATION;

HAPLOTYPES; PEDIGREE; PINUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0037297475     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672302005992     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Almasy, L. & Blangero, J. (1998). Multipoint quantitative-trait analysis in general pedigrees. American Journal of Human Genetics 62, 1198-1211.
2. Auckland, L. D., Bui, T., Zhou, Y., Shepherd, M. & Williams, C. G. (2002). Conifer Microsatellite Handbook. Raleigh, NC: Corporate Press.
3. Beckmann, J. S. & Soller, M. (1988). Detection of linkage between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in crosses between segregating populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76, 228-236.
4. Cannings, C., Thompson, E. A. & Skolnick, M. H. (1978). Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Advances in Applied Probability, 10, 26-61.
5. Churchill, G. A. & Doerge, R. W. (1994). Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963-971.
6. Elston, R. C. & Stewart, J. (1971). A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Human Heredity 21, 523-542.
7. Green, P., Falls, K. & Crooks, S. (1990). Documentation for CRI-MAP, version 2.4. St Louis: Washington University School of Medicine.
8. Greenwood, M. S. (1980). Reproductive development in loblolly pine. I. The early development of male and female strobili in relation to the long shoot growth behavior. American Journal of Botany 67, 1414-1422.
9. Gwaze, D. P., Bridgwater, F. E. & Williams, C. G. (2002). Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105, 526-531.
10. Haley, C. S. & Knott, S. A. (1992). A simple regression model for interval mapping in line crosses. Heredity, 69, 315-324.
11. Haley, C. S., Knott, S. A. & Elsen, J.-M. (1994). Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136, 1195-1207.
12. Kaya, Z., Sewell, M. M. & Neale, D. B. (1999). Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing annual height- and diameter-increment growth in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98, 586-592.
13. Kearsey, M. J. & Pooni, H. S. (1996). The Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Kirkpatrick, M. & Heckman, N. (1989). A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape and other infinite-dimensional characters. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 27, 429-450.
15. Knott, S. A., Neale, D. B., Sewell, M. M. & Haley, C. S. (1997). Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94, 810-820.
16. Lander, E. & Kruglyak, L. (1995). Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nature Genetics 11, 241-247.
17. Magnussen, S. & Kremer, A. (1993). Selection for the optimum tree growth curve. Silvae Genetica 42, 322-335.
18. Martínez, O. & Curnow, R. N. (1992). Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 85, 480-488.
19. Muranty, H. (1996). Power of tests for quantitative trait loci detection using families in different schemes. Heredity, 76, 156-165.
20. Nagamine, Y. & Haley, C. S. (2001). Using the mixed model for interval mapping of quantitative trait loci in outbred line crosses. Genetical Research 77, 199-207.
21. Rekaya, R., Carabano, M. J. & Toro, M. A. (2000). Bayesian analysis of lactation curves of Holstein-Friesian cattle using a nonlinear model. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2691-2701.
22. Reyes-Valdés, M. H. (2000). A model for marker-based selection in gene introgression breeding programs. Crop Science 40, 91-98.
23. Reyes-Valdés, M. H. & Williams, C. G. (2002). A haplotypic approach to founder-origin probabilities and outbred QTL analysis. Genetical Research 80, 231-236.
24. Richards, F. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany 10, 290-300.
25. Smith, C. (1985). Utilization of major genes. In Genetics of Reproduction in Sheep (ed. R. B. Land & D. W. Robinson), pp. 151-158. London: Butterworth.
26. Sobel, E. & Lange, K. (1996). Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics. American Journal of Human Genetics 58, 1323-1337.
27. Williams, C. G. (1998). QTL mapping in outbred plants. In Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits (ed. A. Paterson), pp. 81-94. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
28. Williams, C. G., Zhou, Y. & Hall, S. E. (2001). A chromosomal region promoting outcrossing in a conifer. Genetics 159, 1283-1289.
29. Zhou, Y., Bui, T., Auckland, L. D. & Williams, C. G. (2002). Direct fluorescent primers are superior to M13-tailed primers for automated genotyping of Pinus taeda microsatellites. Biotechniques 32, 46-52.