A review of northern pike population genetics research and its implications for management

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 297-306

  Miller, Loren M ^a   Senanan, Wansuk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; FISH; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ESOX; ESOX LUCIUS;

EID: 0037296266     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2003)023<0297:ARONPP>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Borer, S., L. M. Miller, and A. R. Kapuscinski. 1999. Microsatellites in walleye Stizostedion vitreum. Molecular Ecology 8:36-37.
2. Brzuzan, P., M. Luczynski, and P. A. Kuzniar. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA variation in two samples of northern pike, Esox lucius L. Aquaculture Research 29:521-526.
3. Craig, J. F., editor. 1996. Pike: biology and exploitation. Chapman and Hall, London.
4. Crossman, E. J. 1978. Taxonomy and distribution of North American esocids. Pages 13-26 in R. L. Kendall, editor. Selected coolwater fishes of North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 11, Bethesda, Maryland.
5. Desjardins, M. C. 1996. Molecular genetic variation in muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) and northern pike (Esox lucius) from watersheds in the upper Midwest. Master's thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
6. DeWoody, J. A., and J. C. Avise. 2000. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater, and anadromous fish compared with other animals. Journal of Fish Biology 56:461-473.
7. Estoup, A., K. Gharbi, M. SanCristobal, C. Chevalet, P. Haffray, and R. Guyomard. 1998. Parentage assignment using microsatellites in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatchery populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:715-723.
8. Fields, R. D., M. D. G. Desjardins, J. M. Hudson, T. W. Kassler, J. B. Ludder, J. V. Tranquilli, C. A. Toline, and D. P. Philipp. 1997. Genetic analysis of fish species in the upper Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey, Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 97/5, Urbana-Champaign.
9. Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95-107.
10. Hansen, M. M., J. B. Taggart, and D. Meldrup. 1999. Development of new VNTR markers for pike and assessment of variability at di- and tetranucleotide repeat microsatellite loci. Journal of Fish Biology 55:183-188.
11. Healy, J. A., and M. F. Mulcahy. 1980. A biochemical genetic analysis of populations of northern pike, Esox lucius L., from Europe and North America. Journal of Fish Biology 17:317-324.
12. Hughes, C. R., and D. C. Queller. 1993. Detection of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in a species with little allozyme polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 2:131-137.
13. Koppelman, J. B., and D. P. Philipp. 1986. Genetic applications in muskellunge management. Pages 111-121 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
14. Miller, L. M., L. Kallemeyn, and W. Senanan. 2001. Spawning site and natal site fidelity by northern pike in a large lake: mark-recapture and genetic evidence. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:307-316.
15. Miller, L. M., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 1996. Microsatellite DNA markers reveal new levels of genetic variation in northern pike. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:971-977.
16. Miller, L. M., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 1997. Historical analysis of genetic variation reveals low effective population size in a northern pike (Esox lucius) population. Genetics 147:1249-1258.
17. Miller, L. M., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2003. Genetic guidelines for hatchery supplementation programs. Pages 329-355 in E. Hallerman, editor. Population genetics: principles and practices for fisheries scientists. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
18. Moritz, C. 1994. Defining evolutionarily significant units for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:373-375.
19. Nelson, K., and M. E. Soulé. 1987. Genetical conservation of exploited fishes. Pages 345-368 in N. Ryman and F. Utter, editors. Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
20. Olsen, J. G., P. Bentzen, M. A. Banks, J. B. Shaklee, and S. Young. 2000. Microsatellites reveal population identity of individual pink salmon to allow supportive breeding of a population at risk of extinction. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:232-242.
21. Paetkau, D., W. Calvert, I. Stirling, and C. Strobeck. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4:347-354.
22. Park, L. K., and P. Moran. 1994. Developments in molecular genetic techniques in fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 4:272-299.
23. Reisenbichler, R. R. 1997. Genetic factors contributing to declines of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 223-244 in D. J. Stouder, P. A. Bisson and R. J. Naiman, editors. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future opportunities. Chapman and Hall, New York.
24. Seeb, J. E., L. W. Seeb, D. W. Oates, and F. M. Utter. 1987. Genetic variation and postglacial dispersal of populations of northern pike (Esox lucius) in North America. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:556-561.
25. Senanan, W., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2000. Genetic relationships among populations of northern pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:391-404.
26. Waples, R. S. 1995. Genetic effects of stock transfers of fish. Pages 51-69 in D. P. Philipp, J. M. Epifanio, J. E. Marsden, and J. E. Claussen, editors. Protection of aquatic biodiversity. Proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3. Oxford-IBH, New Dehli.