메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 79, Issue 928, 2003, Pages 74-77

Effects of the civil procedure rules on clinical negligence claims

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; JUSTICE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; REVIEW;

EID: 0037295076     PISSN: 00325473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.928.74     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (3)

References (18)
  • 1
    • 0004217031 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • London: Stationery Office Books and The Lord Chancellor's Department, July
    • Lord Woolf. Access to justice. London: Stationery Office Books and The Lord Chancellor's Department, July 1996.
    • (1996) Access to Justice
    • Lord Woolf1
  • 2
    • 0028304161 scopus 로고
    • Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action
    • Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 1994;343:1609-13.
    • (1994) Lancet , vol.343 , pp. 1609-1613
    • Vincent, C.1    Young, M.2    Phillips, A.3
  • 3
    • 0032897457 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Medical negligence and the NHS: An economic analysis
    • Towse A, Danzon P. Medical negligence and the NHS: an economic analysis. Health Econ 1999;8:93-101.
    • (1999) Health Econ , vol.8 , pp. 93-101
    • Towse, A.1    Danzon, P.2
  • 7
    • 84920347222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Threats, problems and opportunities
    • Gardner C. Threats, problems and opportunities. The Expert 1999;4:10-12.
    • (1999) The Expert , vol.4 , pp. 10-12
    • Gardner, C.1
  • 8
    • 84920349994 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1966
    • The European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1966.
  • 9
    • 84920356241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Human Rights Act 1998
    • Human Rights Act 1998.
  • 10
    • 0345501180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CA 3/5/2000. LTL 3/5/2000 Extempore (unreported elsewhere)
    • Paul Leslie Daniels v Frederick Mark Walker (2000). CA 3/5/2000. LTL 3/5/2000 Extempore (unreported elsewhere).
    • (2000) Paul Leslie Daniels v Frederick Mark Walker
  • 11
    • 0033489511 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of the new civil practice rules on clinical negligence claims
    • Brahams D. The impact of the new civil practice rules on clinical negligence claims. Medico-Legal Journal 1999;67:7-8.
    • (1999) Medico-Legal Journal , vol.67 , pp. 7-8
    • Brahams, D.1
  • 15
    • 84920349717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • col 918 PQ4519/1994/95
    • House of Commons Official Report. Hansard Vol 263 col 918 PQ4519/1994/95.
    • Hansard , vol.263
  • 17
    • 84920352875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eversheds. In-house survey (1999; quoted in http://lawmoney.oyster.co.uk/publicnews/hotnews/news9711/news971125.1html].
    • (1999) In-house Survey
  • 18


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.