Controller tuning freedom under plant identification uncertainty: Double Youla beats gap in robust stability

Automatica

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 325-333

  Douma, Sippe G ^a   Van den Hof, Paul M J ^a   Bosgra, Okko H ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gap metric; Identification for control; Model uncertainty; Robust control; Robust stability; Simultaneous perturbation; Youla parametrization

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; THEOREM PROVING;

TRANSFER MATRIX;

ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 0037294216     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00223-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bombois X., Gevers M., Scorletti G. A measure of robust stability for an identified set of parametrized transfer functions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 45:2000;2141-2145.
2. Bongers, P.M.M. (1991). On a new robust stability margin. Recent Advances in Mathematical Theory of Systems, Control, Networks and Signal Processing, Proceedings of the International Symposium MTNS-91 (pp. 377-382).
3. Bongers, P.M.M. (1994). Modeling and identification of flexible wind turbines and a factorizational approach to robust control. Ph.D. thesis, Delft Univ. of Techn., Mech. Eng. Systems and Control Group.
4. de Callafon R.A., Van den Hof P.M.J., Bongers P.M.M. A unified approach to stability robustness for uncertainty descriptions based on fractional model representations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-41:1996;723-727.
5. de Callafon R.A., Van den Hof P.M.J. Suboptimal feedback control by a scheme of iterative identification and control design. Mathematical Modelling of Systems. 3:1997;77-101.
6. De Vries D.K., Van den Hof P.M.J. Quantification of uncertainty in transfer function estimation. A mixed probabilistic-worst-case approach Automatica. 31:1995;543-557.
7. Georgiou T.T., Smith M.C. Optimal robustness in the gap metric. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-35:1990;673-686.
8. Hakvoort R.G., Van den Hof P.M.J. Identification of probabilistic system uncertainty regions by explicit evaluation of bias and variance errors. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-42:1997;1516-1528.
9. Hjalmarsson, H., Gunnarsson, S., & Gevers, M. (1994). A convergent iterative restricted complexity control design scheme. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference Decision and Control, Lake Buena Vista, FL (pp. 1735-1740).
10. Horn R.A., Johnson C.R. Topics in matrix analysis. 1991;Cambridge University Press, England.
11. Kammer L.C., Bitmead R.R., Bartlett P.L. Direct iterative tuning via spectral analysis. Automatica. 36:2000;1301-1307.
12. Ninness B.M., Goodwin G.C. Estimation of model quality. Automatica. 31:1995;1771-1797.
13. Qui L., Davison E.J. Feedback stability under simultaneous gap metric uncertainties in plant and controller. Systems and Control Letters. 18:1992;9-22.
14. Schrama, R.J.P., Bongers, P.M.M., & Bosgra, O.H. (1992). Robust stability under simultaneous perturbations of linear plant and controller. Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Conference Decision and Control, Tucson, AZ (pp. 2137-2139).
15. Sefton J.A., Ober R.J. On the gap metric and coprime factor perturbations. Automatica. 29:1993;723-734.
16. Tay T.T., Moore J.B., Horowitz R. Indirect adaptive techniques for fixed controller performance enhancement. International Journal of Control. 50:1989;1941-1959.
17. Van den Hof P.M.J. Closed-loop issues in system identification. Annual Reviews in Control. 22:1998;173-186.
18. Vidyasagar M. Control systems synthesis: A factorization approach. 1985;MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
19. Vinnicombe G. Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. AC-38:1993;1371-1383.