Magnetic force microscopy images of a nanometer-sized, purely organic high-spin polyradical

Advanced Functional Materials

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-117

  Miyasaka, Makoto ^a   Saito, Yuka ^a   Nishide, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; GROUND STATE; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIZATION; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORGANIC POLYMERS;

MAGNETIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; MAGNETIC GRADIENT RESPONSE; ORGANIC HIGH SPIN POLYRADICAL; POLYPHENOXYL RADICALS; SPIN CONCENTRATIONS;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

EID: 0037292990     PISSN: 1616301X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200390016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. a) D. D. Awshalom, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. F. Smyth, Science 1992, 258, 414.
2. b) S. Sun, C. B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, A. Moser, Science 2000, 287, 1989.
3. A. N. Shipway, E. Katz, I. Willner, ChemPhysChem 2000, 1, 18.
4. a) T. M. Swager, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 201.
5. b) C. Joachim, J. K. Gimzewskim, A. Aviram, Nature 2000, 408, 541.
6. c) J. M. Tour, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 791.
7. a) D. I. Gittins, D. Bethell, D. J. Schiffrin, R. J. Nichols, Nature 2000, 408, 67.
8. b) F. Moresco, G. Meyer, K-H. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 672.
9. A. D. Schlüter, J. P. Rabe, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 860
10. A. D. Schlüter, J. P. Rabe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 864.
11. F. Fischer, F. Vöglte, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 934
12. F. Fischer, F. Vöglte, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 884.
13. A. Rajca, J. Wongsriratanakul, S. Rajca, R. Cernny, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1284
14. A. Rajca, J. Wongsriratanakul, S. Rajca, R. Cernny, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1229.
15. A. Rajca, S. Rajca, J. Wongsriratanakul, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6308.
16. A. Rajca, J. Wongsriratanakul, S. Rajca, Science 2001, 294, 1503.
17. a) N. J. DiNardo, Nanoscale Characterization of Surfaces and Interfaces; VCH; Weinheim 1994.
18. b) G. P. Lopinski, D. D. M. Wayner, R. A. Wolkow, Nature 2000, 406, 48.
19. c) C. A. Mirkin, S. Hong, L. Demers, ChemPhysChem 2001, 2, 37.
20. a) M. Hehm, K. Ounadjela, J.-P. Bucher, F. Rousseux, D. Decanini, B. Bartenlian, C. Chappert, Science 1996, 272, 1782.
21. b) Q. Lu, C-C. Chen, A. de Lozanne, Science 1997, 276, 2006.
22. c) C. E. Diebel, R. Proksch, C. R. Green, P. Neilson, M. M. Walker, Nature 2000, 406, 299.
23. H. Nishide, Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 937.
24. H. Nishide, T. Kaneko, T. Nii, K. Katoh, E. Tsuchida, P. M. Lahti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9695.
25. H. Nishide, M. Miyasaka, E. Tsuchida, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2497
26. H. Nishide, M. Miyasaka, E. Tsuchida, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2400.
27. H. Nishide, T. Ozawa, M. Miyasaka, E. Tsuchida, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5942.
28. n = 2.6 kDa) determined by ESR and by the saturated magnetization SQUID measurement was 0.52 and 0.50 spin/phenol unit, in each case.
29. n of 2.6, 9.3, and 32 kDa were ca. 10, 25, and 35 nm, respectively.
30. Consistent valence force field (CVFF) calculation of the molecular shape of 1 composed of six phenol units supported the pseudo-two-dimensionally extended disk-like structure with a vertical and horizontal size of 0.6 and 3 nm, respectively.
31. There are two methods of detecting magnetic force in the MFM measurement. The PD method detects a phase difference of amplitude and does not involve any surface information of the sample in a magnetic image. On the other hand, the AD method detects an amplitude change by tuning the drive frequency and is effective for checking whether the MFM image originates from magnetic information.
32. -1] and the set point [V].
33. The presentation on a vertical scale has not been established even for MFM measurements on normal ferromagnetic samples.