Conjugate filter approach for shock capturing

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 99-110

  Gu, Yun ^a   Wei, G W ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjugate filters; Discrete singular convolution; Hyperbolic conservation laws; Shock capturing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATION THEORY; HIGH PASS FILTERS; LOW PASS FILTERS;

CONJUGATE FILTERS;

SHOCK WAVES;

MATHEMATICAL METHOD; SHOCK WAVE;

EID: 0037292616     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.573     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Balaguer A, Conde C, Lopez JA, Martinez V. A finite volume method with a modified ENO scheme using a Hermite interpolation to solve advection-diffusion equation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:2339-2371.
2. Wong GCK, Wong SC. A wavelet-Galerkin method for the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 16:121-131.
3. Bertolazzi E. A finite volume scheme for two-dimensional chemically reactive hypersonic flow. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Heat Fluid Flow 1998; 8:888.
4. Baumann CE, Storti MA, Idelsohn SR. Improving the convergence rate of the Petrov-Galerkin techniques for the solution of transonic and supersonic flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 34:543-568.
5. von Neumann J, Richtmyer RD. A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks. Journal of Applied Physics 1950; 21:232-237.
6. Godunov SK. Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions to the equations of fluid dynamics. Mathematicheski Sbornik 1959; 47:271.
7. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. Journal of Computational physics 1977; 23:276.
8. Woodward PR, Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54:115-173.
9. Bell JB, Colella P, Glaz HM. A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 85:257-283.
10. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation law. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 49:357-393.
11. Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S, Chakravarthy S. Uniform high-order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes III. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 71:231-303.
12. Shu C-W, Osher S. Efficient implementation of non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 77:439-471.
13. Jiang G-S, Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 126:202-228.
14. Wei GW. Synchronization of single-side averaged coupling and its application to shock capturing. Physics Review Letters 2001; 86:3542-3545.
15. Engquist B, Lötstedt P, Sjögreen B. Nonlinear filters for efficient shock computation. Mathematics of Computation 1989; 52:509-537.
16. Wei GW. Discrete singular convolution for the solution of the Fokker-Planck equations. Journal of Chemical Physics 1999; 110:8930-8942.
17. Wei GW, Zhao YB, Xiang Y. Discrete singular convolution and its application to the analysis of plates with internal supports. I Theory and algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 55:947-972.
18. Wei GW. A new algorithm for solving some mechanical problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 190:2017-2030.
19. Lax PD, Wendroff B. Systems of conservation laws. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1960; 13:217-237.