Outcomes research related to patient decision making in oncology

Clinical Therapeutics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 671-683

  Weinfurt, Kevin P ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Ethics; Medical oncology; Outcomes assessment; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; IDENTITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONCOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SATISFACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYPES OF STUDY;

EID: 0037291333     PISSN: 01492918     EISSN: 1879114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80104-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Priestman TJ, Baum M. Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced cancer. Lancet. 1976;1:899-901.
2. List MA, Stracks J, Colangelo L, et al. How do head and neck cancer patients prioritize treatment outcomes before initiating treatment? J Clin Oncol 2000;18:877-884.
3. Mohide EA, Archibald SD, Tew M, et al. Postlaryngectomy quality-of-life dimensions identified by patients and health care professionals. Am J Surg. 1992;164:619-622.
4. Brown M, Glick HA, Harrell F, et al. Integrating economic analysis into cancer clinical trials: The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Economics Workbook. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1998;24:1-28.
5. American College of Physicians. Guidelines for counseling postmenopausal women about preventive hormone therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:1038-1041.
6. Fiset V, O'Connor AM, Evans W, et al. Development and evaluation of a decision aid for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Health Expect. 2000;3:125-136.
7. O'Connor AM, Fiset V, DeGrasse C, et al. Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: Evidence of efficacy and policy implications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25:67-80.
8. O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sawka C, et al. Physicians' opinions about decision aids for patients considering systemic adjuvant therapy for axillary-node negative breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:143-153.
9. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule. Fed Regist. 1991;56:28003-28032.
10. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:20-24.
11. Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, et al. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1062-1072.
12. Hietanen P, Aro AR, Holli K, Absetz P. Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:2096-2104.
13. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, et al. Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:139-147.
14. Meropol NJ, Schulman KA, Weinfurt K, et al. Discordant perceptions of patients and their physicians regarding phase I trials. Presented at: The annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; Orlando, FL; May 18-21, 2002.
15. Hacking I. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
16. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance of a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:37-44.
17. McVea KL, Minier WC, Johnson Palensky JE. Low-income women with early-stage breast cancer: Physician and patient decision-making styles. Psychooncology. 2001;10:137-146.
18. Gruppen LD, Margolin J, Wisdom K, Grum CM. Outcome bias and cognitive dissonance in evaluating treatment decisions. Acad Med. 1994;69(10 Suppl):S57-S59.
19. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
20. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1959.
21. Frenkel OJ, Doob AN. Post-decision dissonance at the polling booth. Can J Behav Sci. 1976;8:347-350.
22. Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:58-64.
23. Endler NS. Persons, situations, and their interactions. In: Rabin AI, Aronoff J, Barclay AM, Zucker RA, eds. Further Explorations in Personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002:114-151.
24. Spielberger CD. Manual of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists' Press; 1983.
25. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31(Pt 3):301-306.
26. Murray E, Davis H, Tai SS, et al. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. BMJ. 2001;323:493-496.
27. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25-30.
28. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:21-43.
29. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941-950.
30. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485-1492.
31. Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:279-289.
32. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Van Manen L. A decision aid for men with early stage prostate cancer: Theoretical basis and a test by surrogate patients. Health Expect. 2001;4:221-234.
33. Dolan JG, Kerr JE. Colorectal cancer screening: A multicriteria decision analysis. Med Decis Making. 1998;18:488.
34. Whelan TJ, Levine MN, Gafni A, et al. Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: Development and evaluation of a decision instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:847-853.
35. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, Sem FW, Woermke DE. Presenting clinical trial information: A comparison of methods. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;25:97-107.
36. Ong LM, Visser MR, Lammes FB, et al. Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: A randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3052-3060.
37. Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761-769.
38. Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D, Dixon P, et al. A treatment trade-off based decision aid for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Health Expect. 2000;3:55-68.
39. Brundage MD, Feldman-Stewart D, Cosby R, et al. Phase I study of a decision aid for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1326-1335.
40. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Rutgers EJ, et al. Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: Effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1676-1687.
41. Edwards A, Elwyn G. How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:428-434.
42. O'Connor AM. A call to standardize measures for judging the efficacy of interventions to aid patients' decision making. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:504-505.
43. Gaskin DJ, Kong J, Meropol NJ, et al. Treatment choices by seriously ill patients: The Health Stock Risk Adjustment model. Med Decis Making. 1998;18:84-94.
44. Steinhauser K, Christakis N, Clipp E, et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476-2482.