Scholarship of teaching and learning in communication: New connections, new directions, new possibilities

Communication Education

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 47-49

  Darling, Ann L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037287681     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520302458     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bass, R. (1999, February). The scholarship of teaching: What's the problem? Inventio, 1, 1-9. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Department of Instructional Improvement and Instructional Technologies.
2. Book, C. L. (1989). Communication education: Pedagogical content knowledge needed. Communication Education, 38, 315-321.
3. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Calloway-Thomas, C. (2001, November). Comments. Panel presentation at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
5. Cambridge, B. (2000). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A national initiative. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy, 18, 55-68.
6. Cerbin, W. (2000). Investigating student learning in a problem-based psychology course. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 11-22). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. Coppola, B. P., Ege, S. N., & Lawton, R. G. (1997). The University of Michigan undergraduate chemistry curriculum, 2: Instructional strategies and assessment. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 84-94.
8. st century students. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
9. Fukami, C. V. (2000). Looking through a different lens: Inquiry into a team-taught course. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 31-40). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Huber, M.T., & Morreale, S. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
12. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 11-16.
13. Kerssen-Griep, J. (2001). Teacher communication activities relevant to student motivation: Classroom facework and instructional communication competence. Communication Education, 50, 256-273.
14. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Sprague, J. (1992). Expanding the research agenda for instructional communication: Raising some unasked questions. Communication Education, 41, 1-25.