Basinwide water management: A spatial model

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-23

  Chakravorty, Ujjayant ^a   Umetsu, Chieko ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR HUMANITY AND NATURE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Conjunctive use; Groundwater economics; Irrigation technology; Spatial models; Water allocation

Indexed keywords

BASIN MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER USE;

EID: 0037284733     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00012-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. T.L. Anderson, R.N. Johnson, The problem of instream flows, Econom. Inquiry 24 (1986) 535-554.
2. M. Caswell, D. Zilberman, The effects of well depth and land quality on the choice of irrigation technology, Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 68 (1986) 798-811.
3. U. Chakravorty, E. Hochman, D. Zilberman, A spatial model of optimal water conveyance, J. Environ. Econom. Management 29 (1995) 25-41.
4. A.C. Chiang, Elements of Dynamic Optimization, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
5. E.J. Dockner, N.V. Long, International pollution control: cooperation versus noncooperative strategies, J. Environ. Econom. Management 24 (1993) 13-29.
6. M. Gisser, Groundwater: focusing on the real issue, J. Polit. Econom. 91 (1983) 1001-1027.
7. M. Gisser, D.A. Sanchez, Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping, Water Resour. Res. 16 (1980) 638-642.
8. R. Griffin, S. Hsu, The potential for water market efficiency when instream flows have value, Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 75 (1993) 292-303.
9. L.M. Hartman, D. Seastone, Water Transfers: Economic Efficiency and Alternative Institutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1970.
10. R. Huffaker, N. Whittlesey, The basinwide economic efficiency of investments in on-farm irrigation technology, Washington State University, 1997, unpublished manuscript.
11. R.N. Johnson, M. Gisser, M. Werner, The definition of a surface water right and transferability, J Law Econom. 26 (1981) 273-288.
12. M.K. Kanazawa, Water quality and the economic efficiency of appropriative water rights, in: A. Dinar, D. Zilberman (Eds.), The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1991.
13. M.K. Kanazawa, Econometric estimation of groundwater pumping costs: a simultaneous equations approach, Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 1507-1516.
14. C.S. Kim, M.R. Moore, J.J. Hanchar, A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining, J. Environ. Econom. Management 17 (1989) 66-82.
15. C.J. Meyers, R.A. Posner, Market Transfers of Water Rights: Towards an Improved market in Water Resources, National Water Commission Legal Study No. 4, Arlington, VA, 1971.
16. D.H. Negri, The common property aquifer as a differential game, Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989) 9-15.
17. D.H. Negri, D.H. Brooks, Determination of irrigation technology choice, West. J. Agric. Econom. 15 (1990) 213-223.
18. D. Seckler, The new era of water resources management: from "dry" to "wet" water savings, International Irrigation Management Institute Research Report 1, 1996.
19. Y. Tsur, T. Graham-Tomasi, The buffer value of groundwater with stochastic surface water supplies, J. Environ. Econom. Management 21 (1991) 201-224.
20. C. Umetsu, U. Chakravorty, Water conveyance, return flows and technology choice, Agric. Econom. 19 (1998) 181-191.
21. University of California, Associated costs of drainage water reduction, Committee of Consultants on Drainage Water Reduction, Salinity/Drainage Task Force and Water Resources Center, 1988.
22. R. Wade, Irrigation reform in conditions of populist anarchy, J. Dev. Econom. 14 (1984) 285-303.
23. World Bank, World Development Report 1994, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1994.
24. World Resources Institute, World Resources - 1994-95, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
25. D. Zilberman, N. MacDougall, F. Shah, Changes in water allocation mechanisms for California agriculture, Contemp. Econom. Policy 12 (1994) 122-133.