Influences on participation rate in a national Norwegian child development screening questionnaire study

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 91-96

  Janson, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ages and Stages Questionnaires; Child development; Questionnaires; Response rate

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MOTHER; NEWBORN; NORWAY; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING;

EID: 0037282047     PISSN: 08035253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00476.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Squires J. Parent-completed developmental questionnaires: a low-cost strategy for child-find and screening. Infants Young Child 1996; 9: 16-28
2. Glascoe F. Developmental screening: rationale, methods, and application. Infants Young Child 1991; 4: 1-10
3. Dobrez D, Sasso AL, Holl J, Shalowitz M, Leon S, Budetti P. Estimating the cost of developmental and behavioral screening of preschool children in general pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2001; 108:913-22
4. Mangione TW. Mail surveys. In: Bickman L, Rog D, editors. Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. p. 399-427
5. Green KE. Sociodemographic factors and mail survey response. Psychol Market 1996; 13: 171-84
6. Gerrits MH, van den Oord JCG, Voogt R. An evaluation of nonresponse in peer, self, and teacher ratings of children's psychosocial adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42: 593-602
7. Nøvik TS. Are postal surveys in child psychiatry feasible? Results of an epidemiological study. Nord J Psychiatry 1995; 49: 337-42
8. Gjone H, Nøvik TS. Parental ratings of behaviour problems: a twin and general population comparison. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1995; 36: 1213-24
9. Janus M, Goldberg S. Factors influencing family participation in a longitudinal study: comparison of pediatric and healthy samples. J Pediatr Psychol 1997; 22: 245-62
10. Christensen M. An interdisciplinary theoretical framework for the mailed questionnaire process and the development of a theory on immediacy and saliency as significant variables of response rates. Dissertation. Logan, UT: Utah State University; 1996
11. Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D. ASQ user's guide. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes; 1999
12. Cunningham JA, Ansara D, Wild TC, Toneatto T, Koski-Jaennes A. What is the price of perfection? The hidden costs of using detailed assessment instruments to measure alcohol consumption. J Stud Alcohol 1999; 60: 756-8
13. Reuband K. Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Einsatzes postalischer Befragungen. Kölner Z Soziol Sozialpsychol 2001; 53: 307-33
14. Ribisl KM, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson WS, Bootsmiller DJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Educ Program Plan 1996; 19: 1-26