Assessing preferences for staff: Some pilot data

Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 103-107

  Sturmey, Peter ^a   Lee, Ronald ^a   Reyer, Howie ^a   Robek, Adrienne ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental disabilities; Preferences; Reinforcer assessment; Staff assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REINFORCEMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STAFF; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037281831     PISSN: 13524658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1352465803001103     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. DELEON, I. G., & IWATA, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-532.
2. FISHER, W., PIAZZA, C. C., BOWMAN, L. G., HAGOPIAN, L. P., OWENS, J. C., & SLEVIN, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
3. PACE, G. M., IVANCIC, M. T., EDWARDS, G. L., IWATA, B. A., & PAGE, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
4. REDD, W. H., & BIRNBRAUER, J. S. (1969). Adults as discriminative stimuli for different reinforcement contingencies with retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 440-447.
5. RINGDAHL, J. E., & SELLERS, J. A. (2000). The effects of different adults as therapists during functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 247-250.