Roe v. Wade at 30: What are the prospects for abortion provision?

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-33

  Joffe, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

ABORTION, INDUCED; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; POLITICS; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC OPINION; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 0037270445     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-2393.2003.tb00082.x     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade: trends in the mortality and morbidity of women, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992, 268(22):3231-3239; Cates W, jr., et al., Legal abortion mortality in the United States-epidemiologic surveillance, 1972-1974, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1977, 237(5):452-455; and Rosen R, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America, New York: Viking, 2000.
2. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade: trends in the mortality and morbidity of women, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992, 268(22):3231-3239; Cates W, Jr., et al., Legal abortion mortality in the United States-epidemiologic surveillance, 1972-1974, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1977, 237(5):452-455; and Rosen R, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America, New York: Viking, 2000.
3. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, Induced termination of pregnancy before and after Roe v Wade: trends in the mortality and morbidity of women, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992, 268(22):3231-3239; Cates W, jr., et al., Legal abortion mortality in the United States-epidemiologic surveillance, 1972-1974, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1977, 237(5):452-455; and Rosen R, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America, New York: Viking, 2000.
4. Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 2000.
5. A statement on abortion by one hundred professors of obstetrics, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1972, 112(7):992-998.
6. Klein L, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, personal communication, Aug. 23, 2002.
7. Finer LB and Henshaw SK, Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2002, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2003, 35(1):6-15.
8. I b i d.
9. Joffe CE, Doctors of Conscience: The Struggle to Provide Abortion Before and After Roe v. Wade, Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.
10. Villarosa L, Newest skill for future ob-gyns: abortion training, New York Times, June 11, 2002, p. D6; and Sappenfield M, California passes broad abortion-rights legislation: with most states hostile to extending rights, the package of bills is remarkable, Christian Science Monitor, Sept. 13, 2002, USA section, p. 2.
11. Villarosa L, Newest skill for future ob-gyns: abortion training, New York Times, June 11, 2002, p. D6; and Sappenfield M, California passes broad abortion-rights legislation: with most states hostile to extending rights, the package of bills is remarkable, Christian Science Monitor, Sept. 13, 2002, USA section, p. 2.
12. Joffe CE, 1995, op cit. (see reference 7).
13. Creinin MD et al., Medical abortion with oral methotrexate and vaginal misoprostol, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997, 90(4, pt. 1):611-616.
14. Chesler E, The abortion debate: finding common ground, Ideas for an Open Society: Reproductive Health and Rights, 2001, 1(2):2-5.
15. Finer LB and Henshaw SK, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 5).
16. Joffe C, Anderson P and Steinauer J, The crisis in abortion provision and pro-choice medical activism in the 1990s, in: Solinger R, ed., Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle, 1950-2000, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998, pp. 320-333.
17. Access Project, 〈http://www.theaccessproject.org〉, accessed Sept. 12, 2002.
18. Abortion Access Project, 〈http://www.abortionaccess.org〉, accessed Sept. 12, 2002.
19. Jaffe FS, Lindheim BL and Lee PR, Abortion Politics: Private Morality and Public Policy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
20. Fellowship in family planning, 〈http://www.familyplanningfellowship.org〉, accessed Sept. 12, 2002.
21. Training programs and fellowships, Kenneth J. Ryan Residency Training Program, 〈http://www.reprohealth.uscf.edu〉, accessed Dec. 18, 2002.
22. Borgmann CE and Jones BS, Legal issues in the provision of medical abortion, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000, 183(Suppl. 2): S84-S94.
23. Jones BS, Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers: Avoiding the "TRAP," New York: Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, 2001.
24. Mergerwatch, 〈http://www.mergerwatch.org〉, accessed Sept. 12, 2002.
25. Mundy L, Notes from a doctor, Washington Post, Feb. 17, 2002, p. W18.
26. Ashok PW et al., An effective regimen for early medical abortion: a report of 2,000 consecutive cases, Human Reproduction, 1998, 13(10): 2962-2965; and Schaff EA et al., Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion, Contraception, 1999, 59(1):1-6.
27. Ashok PW et al., An effective regimen for early medical abortion: a report of 2,000 consecutive cases, Human Reproduction, 1998, 13(10): 2962-2965; and Schaff EA et al., Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion, Contraception, 1999, 59(1):1-6.
28. Joffe C and Weitz TA, Normalizing the exceptional: incorporating the "abortion pill" into mainstream medicine, Social Science & Medicine, 2003 (forthcoming).
29. Fjerstad M, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Santa Barbara, CA, personal communication, Sept. 10, 2002.
30. Tews L, National Abortion Federation, Washington, DC, personal communication, Sept. 10, 2002.
31. Hodgson JE, The twentieth-century gender battle: difficulties in perception, in: Solinger R, ed., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 13), pp. 290-306.
32. Rosenfeld JA, ed., Handbook of Women's Health: An Evidence-Based Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
33. Saad L, Public opinion about abortion-an in-depth review, Gallup Poll Special Reports, 2002, http://www.gallup.com/poll/specialReports/pollSummaries/sr020122 viii.asp〉.