Generation and display of activity-weighted chemical hyperstructures

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 288-297

  Brown, Nathan ^a   Willett, Peter ^a   Wilton, David J ^a   Lewis, Richard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULES;

ACTIVITY WEIGHTED CHEMICAL HYPERSTRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL REDUNDANCY;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 0037269892     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0103875     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Free, S. M.; Wilson, J. W. A Mathematical Contribution to Structure Activity Studies. J. Med. Chem. 1964, 7, 395-399.
2. Fujita, T.; Ban, T. Structure-Activity Study of Phenethylamines as Substrates of Biosynthetic Enzymes of Sympathetic Transmitters. J. Med. Chem. 1971, 14, 148-152.
3. a and Antitumor Activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 26, 575-592.
4. Adamson, G. W.; Bush, J. A. A Method for Relating the Structure and Properties of Chemical Compounds. Nature 1974, 248, 406-407.
5. Cramer, R. D.; Redl, G.; Berkoff, C. E. Substructural Analysis. A Novel Approach to the Problem of Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 1973, 17, 533-535.
6. Klopman, G. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Structure-Activity Studies. Computer Automated Structure Evaluation of Biological Activity of Organic Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7315-7321.
7. Ormerod, A.; Willett, P.; Bawden, D. Comparison of Fragment Weighting Schemes for Substructural Analysis. Quant. Struct.-Activ. Relat. 1989, 8, 115-129.
8. Sheridan, R. P.; Nachbar, R. B.; Bush, B. L. Extending the Trend Vector - the Trend Matrix and Sample-Based Partial Least-Squares. J. Comput.-Aid. Mol. Design 1994, 8, 323-340.
9. Roberts, G.; Myatt, G. J.; Johnson, W. P.; Cross, K. P.; Blower, P. E. LeadScope: Software for Exploring Large Sets of Screening Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1302-1314.
10. Poroikov, V.; Akimov, D.; Shabelnikova, E.; Filimonov, D. Top 200 Medicines: can new Actions be Discovered through Computer-Aided Prediction? SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2001, 12, 327-344.
11. Simon, Z.; Chirica, A.; Holban, S.; Ciubotaru, D.; Mihala, G. I. Minimum Steric Difference. The MTD Method for QSAR Studies; Research Studies Press: Letchworth, UK, 1994.
12. Downs, G. M.; Gill, G. S.; Willett, P.; Walsh, P. T. Automated Descriptor Selection and Hyperstructure Generation to Assist SAR studies. SAR QSAR Environment. Res. 1995, 3, 253-264.
13. Palyulin, V. A.; Radchenko, E. V.; Zefirov, N. A. Molecular Field Topology Analysis Method in QSAR Studies of Organic Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 659-667.
14. Vladutz, G.; Gould, S. R. Joint Compound/Reaction Storage and Retrieval and Possibilities of a Hyperstructure-Based Solution. In Chemical Structures. The International Language of Chemistry. Warr, W. A., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988; pp 371-384.
15. Brown, R. D.; Downs, G. M.; Willett, P. A Hyperstructure Model for Chemical Structure Handling: Generation and Atom-by-Atom Searching of Hyperstructures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 522-531.
16. Brown, R. D.; Downs, G. M.; Jones, G.; Willett, P. A Hyperstructure Model for Chemical Structure Handling: Techniques for Substructure Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 47-53.
17. Hagadone, T. R. Molecular Substructure Similarity Searching: Efficient Retrieval in Two-Dimensional Structure Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1982, 22, 515-521.
18. McGregor, J. J. Backtrack Search Algorithms and the Maximal Common Subgraph. Software-Pract. Exper. 1982, 12, 23-34.
19. Bayada, D.; Simpson, R. W.; Johnson, A. P. An Algorithm for the Multiple-Common Subgraph Problem. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 680-685.
20. Raymond, J. W.; Gardiner, E. J.; Willett, P. Heuristics for Rapid Similarity Searching of Chemical Graphs Using a Maximum Common Edge Subgraph Algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 305-316.
21. Brown, R. D.; Jones, G.; Willett, P. Matching Two-Dimensional Chemical Graphs Using Genetic Algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 63-70.
22. Evolutionary Algorithms in Computer-Aided Molecular Design; Clark, D. E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
23. SYBYL is produced by Tripos Inc. at http://www.tripos.com/.
24. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and machine Learning; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1989.
25. REBOL Technologies Inc. is at http://www.rebol.com/.
26. The NCI AIDS database is available at http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/.
27. The ID Alert database is available from Current Drugs Limited at http://www.current-drugs.com/.
28. Rosenkranz, H. S.; Cunningham, A. R. SAR Modeling of Unbalanced Data Sets. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2001, 12, 267-274.
29. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
30. Shemetulskis, N. E.; Weininger, D.; Blankley, C. J.; Yang, J. J.; Humblet, C. STIGMATA: An Algorithm to Determine Structural Commonalities in Diverse Data Sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 862-871.