Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 877-881) [1]

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 121-

  Saunders, J R ^a   Chan, C L H ^a   Williams, N S ^a  

^a ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGELCHICK PROSTHESIS; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTIFICIAL ANAL SPHINCTER; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EROSION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FOLLOW UP; GRACILIS MUSCLE; HUMAN; INFECTION; LETTER; MECHANICAL FAILURE; MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS EROSION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS MIGRATION; SEPSIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; ANAL CANAL; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; NOTE;

ANAL CANAL; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS;

EID: 0037267731     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4086     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Steele RJ, Amar SS, Evans D, Morris DL, Foster GE et al. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 862-864.
2. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166-1169.