Effect of videoconferencing on the process of cooperation between primary and secondary care

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-59

  Winblad, Ilkka ^a   Vuolio, Saija ^b   Haukipuro, Kari ^b   Ohinmaa, Arto ^b  

^a Pyhajärvi Health Centre   (Finland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TELEMEDICINE;

AMBULATORY CARE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 0037267353     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/135763303321159710     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Harrison R, Clayton W, Wallace P. The future role of telemedicine at the interface between primary and secondary care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1996;2 (suppl. 1):87–8.
2. Rothchild E. Telepsychiatry: why do it? Psychiatric Annals 1999;29: 394–401.
3. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. British Medical Journal 2000;320:1252–6.
4. Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? British Medical Journal 1996;313:1062–8.
5. World Medical Association. Statement on accountability, responsibilities and ethical guidelines in the practice of telemedicine. Adopted by the 51st World Medical Assembly, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 1999. See http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-36_e.html. Last checked 16 September 2002.
6. Wootton R. Recent advances. Telemedicine. British Medical Journal 2001;323:557–60.