Unbundling evaluation use

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-12

  Alkin, Marvin C ^a   Taut, Sandy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037262589     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90001-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alkin, M.C. (1985). A guide for evaluation decision makers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T., & Akert, R. (1999). Social psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
3. Cousins, J.B., & Leithwood, K.A. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56 (3), 331-364.
4. Cousins, J.B., & Shulha, L.M. (2002, November). Recent developments in inquiry about knowledge and research utilization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Washington, DC.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry for education (pp. 197-222). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
6. Fischer, L., & Wiswede, G. (1997). Grundlagen der Sozialpsychologie [Foundations of Social Psychology]. München: Oldenbourg.
7. Greene, J.C. (1988). Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 12 (2), 91-116.
8. Hofstetter, C.H., & Alkin, M.C. (in press). Evaluation use revisited. In D.L. Stufflebeam, T. Kellaghan, & L. Wingate (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
9. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Kirkhart, K.E. (2000). Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. New Directions for Evaluation, 88, 5-23.
11. National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. Shavelson, R.J., & Towne, L. (Eds.), Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
12. Owen, J.M., with Rogers, P. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
13. Owen, J.M. (2002, November). Linking evaluation use to the research utilisation literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Washington, DC.
14. Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The New Century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Preskill, H., & Torres, R.T. (1999). Evaluation inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Preskill, H., & Torres, R.T. (2000). The learning dimension of evaluation use. New Directions for Evaluation, 88, 25-37.
17. Rich, R.F. (1977). Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C.H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 199-211). Lexington, VA: Lexington Books.
18. Russ-Eft, D., Atwood, R., & Egherman, T. (2002). Use and non-use of evaluation results: Case study of environmental influences in the private sector. American Journal of Evaluation, 23 (1), 19-31.
19. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R.E. Stake (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation. American Education Research Monograph Series on Evaluation, No. 1. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
20. Shulha, L.M., & Cousins, J.B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18 (3), 195-208.