Reliability and magnitude of visual laterality effects: Further examination of the endogenous cueing procedure

Laterality

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-37

  Voyer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RELIABILITY; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULATION; STIMULUS; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0037260194     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713754472     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barton, M.I., Goodglass, H., & Shai, A. (1965). Differential recognition of tachistoscopically presented English and Hebrew words in right and left visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 431-437.
2. Boles, D.B. (1990). What bilateral displays do. Brain and Cognition, 12, 205-228.
3. Boles, D.B. (1995). Parameters of the bilateral effect. In F.L. Kitterle (Ed.), Hemispheric Communications: Mechanisms and Models (pp. 211-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
4. Bryden, M.P. (1978). Strategy effects in the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of Information Processing (pp. 117-149). London: Academic Press.
5. Bryden, M.P. (1982). Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain. New York: Academic Press.
6. Bryden, M.P. (1986). On the possible danger of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies. Brain and Cognition, 5, 362-368.
7. Bryden, MP., & Mondor, T.A. (1991). Attentional factors in visual field asymmetries. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 427-447.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis of the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
9. Cormier, P., & Stubbert, J.A. (1991). Instruction effects on gender differences in visual field advantage during lexical decision tasks. Cortex, 27, 453-458.
10. Ellis, A.W., Young, A.W., & Anderson, C. (1988). Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemisperes. Brain and Language, 35, 254-273.
11. Hiscock, M., Cole, L.C., Benthall, J.G., Carlson, V.L., & Ricketts, J.M. (2000). Toward solving the inferential problem in laterality research: Effects of increased reliability on the validity of the dichotic listening right-ear advantage. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 539-547.
12. Iaccino, J.F. (1993). Left Brain-Right Brain Differences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
13. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-356.
14. Mishkin, M., & Forgays, D.G. (1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 43-48.
15. Olk, B., & Hartje, W. (2001). The bilateral effect: Callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition? Brain and Cognition, 45, 317-324.
16. Schneider, W. (1995). Mel V. 2.0 User's Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
17. Steenhuis, R.E., & Bryden, M.P. (1989). Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities. Cortex, 25, 289-304.
18. Thorndike, E.L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
19. Voyer, D. (2001). Reliability and magnitude of visual laterality effects: The influence of attention. Laterality, 6, 315-336.
20. Witelson, S.F. (1974). Hemispheric specialization for linguistic and nonlinguistic tactual perception using a dichotomous stimulation technique. Cortex, 10, 3-17.
21. Young, A.W., & Ellis, A.W. (1985). Differential methods of lexical access for word presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24, 326-358.