Empirical evidence showing the relationships between three approaches for pollution control

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-101

  Wilson, Clevo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Avertive behaviour; Contingent valuation; Cost of illness; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COSTS;

AVERTIVE BEHAVIOR;

POLLUTION CONTROL;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; HEALTH IMPACT; POLLUTION CONTROL; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0037257898     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022838112228     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Alberini, A. and A. Krupnick (2000), 'Cost-Of-Illness and Willingness-To-Pay Estimates of the Benefits of Improved Air Quality: Evidence from Taiwan', Land Economics 76, 37-53.
2. Carson, T. C., N. E. Flores and N. F. Meade (2001), 'Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence', Environmental and Resource Economics 19, 173-210.
3. Cropper, M. L. and A. M. Freeman (1991), 'Environmental Health Effects', in J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad, eds., Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality (pp. 165-211). Amsterdam, B. V. (North Holland): Elsevier Science Publishers.
4. Whittington, D. (1998), 'Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries', Worm Development 26, 21-30.