Precoated femoral component in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: Results at a mean 10-year follow-up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-5

  Lachiewicz, Paul F ^a   Messick, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Femoral component; Hip arthroplasty; Hybrid arthroplasty; Precoat

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0037257540     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50017     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ahmed AM, Raab S, Miller JE: Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation. J Orthop Res 2:105, 1984
2. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ: Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop 355:90, 1998
3. Crowninshield RD, Tolbert JR: Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well fixed femoral component stems. J Biomed Mater Res 17:819, 1983
4. Davies JP, Singer G, Harris WH: The effect of a thin coating of polymethylmethacrylate on the torsional fatigue strength of the cement-metal interface. J Appl Biomater 3:45, 1992
5. Cannestra VP, Berger RA, Quigley LR, et al: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem: four to nine-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1291, 2000
6. Dowd JE, Cha CW, Traku S, et al: Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis: 4- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop 355:123, 1998
7. Gardiner RC, Hozack WJ: Failure of the cement-bone interface: a consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? J Bone Joint Surg Br 76: 49, 1994
8. Brown EC II, Lachiewicz PF: Precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty: results at 5- to 9-year follow-up. Clin Orthop 364:153, 1999
9. Latimer HA, Lachiewicz PF: Porous-coated acetabular components with screw fixation: Five to ten year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:975, 1996
10. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737, 1969
11. Barrack RL, Mulroy R Jr, Harris WH: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: a 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:385, 1992
12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: 'Modes of failure' of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
13. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:161, 1990
14. Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O'Neill DA: Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral component fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1063, 1982
15. DeLee JG, Charnley J: Radiographic demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20, 1976
16. Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA: Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration: an experimental study. J Arthroplasty 4:245, 1989
17. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B: Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:518, 1990
18. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Ayers DC: Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J Orthop Res 15:700, 1997
19. Berger RA, Seel MJ, Wood K, et al: Effect of a centralizing device on cement mantle deficiencies and initial prosthetic alignment in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:434, 1997