The effects of serial position and frequency of presentation of common stimulus features on orienting response reinstatement

Psychophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 139-145

  Ben Shakhar, Gershon ^a   Gati, Itamar ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Feature matching theory; Habituation; Orienting response; Skin conductance response; Stimulus novelty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0037254466     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00014     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1985). Standardization within individuals: A simple method to neutralize individual differences in psychophysiological responsivity. Psychophysiology, 22, 292-299.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., Asher, T., Poznansky-Levy, A., Asherowitz, R., & Lieblich, I. (1989). Stimulus novelty and significance as determinants of electrodermal responsivity: The serial position effect. Psychophysiology, 26, 29-38.
3. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Gati, I. (1987). Common and distinctive features of verbal and pictorial stimuli as determinants of psychophysiological responsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 91-105.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Gati, I. (1992). The effect of common versus distinctive stimulus features on electrodermal orientation to significant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 29, 306-314.
5. Ben-Shakhar, G., Gati, I., Ben-Bassat, N., & Sniper, G. (2000). Orienting response reinstatement and dishabituation: The effects of substituting, adding and deleting components of nonsignificant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 102-110.
6. Ben-Shakhar, G., Gati, I., & Salamon, N. (1995). Generalization of the orienting response to significant stimuli: The roles of common and distinctive stimulus components. Psychophysiology, 32, 36-42.
7. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Lieblich, I. (1982). Similarity of auditory stimuli and generalization of skin conductance response (SCR) habituation. Physiological Psychology, 10, 331-335.
8. Bernstein, A. (1969). To what does the orienting response respond? Psychophysiology, 6, 338-350.
9. Bernstein, A. (1979). The orienting response as a novelty and significance detector: Reply to O'Gorman. Psychophysiology, 16, 263-273.
10. Connolly, J. F., & Frith, C. D. (1978a). Effects of stimulus variability on the amplitude and habituation of the electrodermal orienting response. Psychophysiology, 15, 550-555.
11. Connolly, J. F., & Frith, C. D. (1978b). Effects of varying stimulus context on habituation and sensitization of the O.R. Physiology & Behavior, 21, 511-514.
12. Corman, C. D. (1967). Stimulus generalization of habituation of the galvanic skin response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 236-240.
13. Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W. W., Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1981). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 18, 232-239.
14. Furedy, J. J. (1968). Human orienting reactions as a function of electrodermal versus plethysmographic response modes and single versus alternating stimulus series. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 70-78.
15. Furedy, J. J., Davis, C., & Gurevich, M. (1988). Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: A psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683-688.
16. Furedy, J. J., Gigliotti, F., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: The effect of choice vs. no choice of deceptive items. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 13-22.
17. Furedy, J. J., Posner, R., & Vincent, A. (1991). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: Memory-difficulty and perceived-accuracy manipulations. Psychophysiology, 28, 163-171.
18. Gati, I., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1990). Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: A feature-matching approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 251-263.
19. Gati, I., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Avni-Liberty, S. (1996). Stimulus novelty and significance in electrodermal orienting responses: The effects of adding versus deleting stimulus components. Psychophysiology, 33, 637-643.
20. Gati, I., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Oren, C. (1986). The relationship between similarity judgments and psychophysiological responsivity. Acta Psychologia, 62, 123-139.
21. Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual process theory. Psychological Review, 77, 419-450.
22. Houck, R. L., & Mefferd, R. B. (1969). Generalization of GSR habituation to mild intramodal stimuli. Psychophysiology, 6, 202-206.
23. Maltzman, I. (1979). Orienting reflexes and significance: A reply to O'Gorman. Psychophysiology, 16, 274-281.
24. Mino, T., & Miyata, Y. (1975). Effects of the range of stimulus variation upon habituation of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 12, 136-140.
25. O'Gorman, J. G. (1979). The orienting reflex: Novelty or significance? Psychophysiology, 16, 253-262.
26. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflex. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
27. Siddle, D. A. T. (1991). Orienting, habituation, and resource allocation: An associative analysis. Psychophsysiology, 28, 245-259.
28. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
29. Sokolov, E. N. (1966). Orienting reflex as information regulator. In: A. Leontyev, A. Luria, & A Smirnov, (Eds.). Psychological research in U.S.S.R. (pp. 334-360). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
30. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
31. Vincent, A., & Furedy, J. J. (1992). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: Potentially confounding and influencing factors. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 129-136.
32. Zimny, G. H., Pawlick, G. F., & Saur, D. F. (1969). Effects of stimulus order and novelty on orienting responses. Psychophysiology, 5, 166-173.
33. Zimny, G. H., & Schwabe, L. W. (1965). Stimulus change and habituation of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 2, 103-114.