메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 180-183

The position statement and its commentators: Consensus, compromise or confusion?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEATH; DYING; EUROPE; EUTHANASIA; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; IDEOLOGY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; NOMENCLATURE; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATIENT RIGHT; PHYSICIAN; SEDATION; SUICIDE; TERMINAL CARE; TERMINAL DISEASE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0037253418     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269216303pm761ed     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (12)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 0018512062 scopus 로고
    • The definition of euthanasia
    • Although see, e.g
    • Although see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Davidson A. The definition of euthanasia. J Med Philos 1979; 4: 294-312;
    • (1979) J. Med. Philos. , vol.4 , pp. 294-312
    • Beauchamp, T.L.1    Davidson, A.2
  • 2
    • 0024028322 scopus 로고
    • The definition of euthanasia
    • Wreen M. The definition of euthanasia. Philos Phenom Res 1988; 48: 637-53.
    • (1988) Philos. Phenom. Res. , vol.48 , pp. 637-653
    • Wreen, M.1
  • 3
    • 0036230902 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conditions and consequences of medical futility - From a literature review to a clinical model
    • For example
    • For example, Löfmark R, Nilstun T. Conditions and consequences of medical futility - from a literature review to a clinical model. J Med Ethics 2002; 28: 115-19.
    • (2002) J. Med. Ethics , vol.28 , pp. 115-119
    • Löfmark, R.1    Nilstun, T.2
  • 4
    • 0003813087 scopus 로고
    • The end of life: Euthanasia and morality
    • For criticism of the distinction see, e.g., Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • For criticism of the distinction see, e.g., Rachels J. The end of life: euthanasia and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
    • (1986)
    • Rachels, J.1
  • 5
    • 0033622315 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Causal authorship and the equality principle: A defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
    • For support of the distinction see, e.g.
    • For support of the distinction see, e.g., Stauch M. Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 237-41.
    • (2000) J. Med. Ethics , vol.26 , pp. 237-241
    • Stauch, M.1
  • 6
    • 0345267044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The principle of double effect and terminal sedation
    • See e.g
    • See e.g. Williams G. The principle of double effect and terminal sedation. Med Law Rev 2001; 9: 41-53.
    • (2001) Med. Law Rev. , vol.9 , pp. 41-53
    • Williams, G.1
  • 7
    • 0033614658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • When doctors might kill their patients: The moral character of clinicians or the best interests of patients?
    • For criticism see, e.g
    • For criticism see, e.g., Doyal L. When doctors might kill their patients: The moral character of clinicians or the best interests of patients? BMJ 1999; 318: 1432-33;
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 1432-1433
    • Doyal, L.1
  • 8
    • 0003560902 scopus 로고
    • second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Singer P. Practical ethics, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993;
    • (1993) Practical Ethics
    • Singer, P.1
  • 9
    • 0003813087 scopus 로고
    • The end of life: Euthanasia and morality
    • Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Rachels J. The end of life: euthanasia and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
    • (1986)
    • Rachels, J.1
  • 10
    • 0003640772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: An argument against legalisation
    • For support, see e.g., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • For support, see e.g., Keown J. Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: An argument against legalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;
    • (2002)
    • Keown, J.1
  • 11
    • 0033614718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • When doctors might kill their patients: Foreseeing is not necessarily the same as intending
    • Gillon R. When doctors might kill their patients: Foreseeing is not necessarily the same as intending. BMJ 1999; 318: 1431-32.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 1431-1432
    • Gillon, R.1
  • 12
    • 0032088462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Palliative care - A euthanasia-free zone?
    • For some similar arguments see, e.g
    • For some similar arguments see, e.g., Farsides B. Palliative care - a euthanasia-free zone? J Med Ethics 1998; 24: 149-50.
    • (1998) J Med Ethics , vol.24 , pp. 149-150
    • Farsides, B.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.