The effects of badly behaved routers on Internet congestion

International Journal of Network Management

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 83-94

  Curran, Kevin ^a   Woods, Derek ^a   McDermot, Nadene ^a   Bradley, Colleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BANDWIDTH; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS); INTERNET; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PACKET NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; WEBSITES;

DYNAMIC ROUTING ALGORITHMS; INTERNET PROTOCOL;

ROUTERS;

EID: 0037250252     PISSN: 10557148     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nem.464     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allman M. et al. TCP congestion control, request for comments: 2581. Network Working Group, April 1999.
2. Balakrishnan H. et al. An integrated congestion management architecture for Internet hosts. ACM, 1999.
3. Behaghel D. Network access in a multimedia age. Telecommunications 1999.
4. Bonald T, Massoulie I. Impact of Fairness on Internet performance.
5. Bradley C. An Analytical Study of Internet Congestion. Msc Thesis, Computer Science Department Science Deparment, UCL, 2000.
6. Bruno C, Kilmartin G, Tolly K. Fast relief from slow websites. Network World Nov. 1999.
7. Floyd S, Fall K. Promoting the use of end to end congestion control in the Internet. IEEE/ACM transactions on Networking, August 1999, Vol.No. 7, No. 4, pp. 458-472.
8. Floyd S. Congestion control principles, request for comments: 2914. Network Working Group, 2000
9. Floyd S. A report on some recent developments in TCP congestion control. IEEE Communications Magazine April 2001.
10. Key P. et al. Congestion pricing for congestion avoidance. Caltech Technical Report, February 1999.
11. Kumar VP. et al. Beyond best effort: router architectures for the differentiated services of tomorrow's internet, 1998.
12. Lefelhocz C. Congestion control for best effort service-why we need a new paradigm. IEEE Network, Vol. 10, No. 1, Jan-Feb 1996.
13. Mahajan R. et al. Controlling high-bandwidth flows at the congested router. ACIRI November 2000.
14. Maurer SM, Huberman BA. Restart strategies and internet congestion. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2001.
15. Mo J. et al. Analysis and comparison of TCP Reno and Vegas. IEEE Networks July 1998.
16. Morris R, Lin D. Dynamics of random early detection, SIGCOM'97, Cannes, France. September 1997, pp. 127-137.
17. Murray M. et al. Measuring the immeasurable: global Internet measurement infrastructure, available online from www.caida.org, April 2001.
18. Nagle J. Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks, request for comments: 896. Network Working Group, January 1984.
19. Odlyzko A. Paris Metro pricing for the Internet. AT&T Labs-Research Internal Report AT823-23, 1998.
20. Padhye J. et al. A model based TCP-Friendly Rate Control Protocol. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV '99 (Basking Ridge, NJ, June, 1999).
21. Postel J. Internet control message protocol, request for comments: 792. Network Working Group, September 1981.
22. Rekhter Y. A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4), request for comments: 1771. Network Working Group, March 1995.
23. Sarkar M. An assessment of pricing mechanisms for the Internet-a regulatory imperative. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 1996, 2(1).
24. Shaikh A. et al. Routing stability in congested networks: experimentation and analysis. SIGCOMM 2000, 163-17.
25. Venkitaraman N, Tae-eun Kim, Kong-Won Lee. Design and evaluation of congestion control algorithms in the future Internet. Measurement & Modelling of Computer Systems, pp. 212-213, 1999.
26. Yang C, Reddy VS. A taxonomy for congestion control algorithms in packet switching networks. IEEE Network Magazine 1995; 9: 5, July / August.
27. Yang YR, Lam SS. General AIMD Congestion Control. Technical Report TR-200009, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, May 2000. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/yang00general.html.