Study of hip fracture risk using tree structured survival analysis

Journal fur Mineralstoffwechsel

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 11-16

  Lu, Ying ^a   Black, D ^b   Mathur, A K ^c   Genant, H K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; FOREARM; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CODING; POSTMENOPAUSE; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SPINE; SURVIVAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037248340     PISSN: 10237763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Gerkins VR, Henderson BE, Arthur M, Mack TM. Menopausal estrogen therapy and hip fractures. Ann Intern Med 1981; 95: 28-31.
2. Cooper C, Backer DJP, Wickham C. Physical activity, muscle, strength, and calcium intake in fracture of the proximal femur in Britain. BMJ 1988; 297: 1443-6.
3. Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL et al. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1326-31.
4. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC. Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111: 355-61.
5. Farmer ME, Harris T, Madams JH, Wallace RB, Cornoni-Huntley J, While LR. Anthropometric indicators and hip fracture: the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37: 9-16.
6. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 1993; 341: 72-5.
7. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 767-73.
8. Jergas MD, Genant HK. Current methods and recent advances in the diagnosis of Osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1993; 36: 1649-62.
9. Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Gluer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M. Comparisons of non-invasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. J Bone Mineral Res 1997; 12: 697-711.
10. Hui S, Slemenda C, Carey M, Jr CJ. Choosing Between Predictors of Fractures. J Bone Mineral Res 1995; 10: 1816-22.
11. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1972; 34: 187-202.
12. Segal MR. Regression trees for censored data. Biometrics 1988; 44: 35-47.
13. Segal MR, Bloch DA. A comparison of estimated proportional hazards models and regression trees. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8: 539-50.
14. Segal MR, James IR, French MAH, Mallal SA. Statistical issues in the evaluation of markers of HIV progression. Int Stat Rev 1995; 179-97.
15. Altman RD, Medsger Jr. TA, Bloch DA, Michel BA. Predictors of survival in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1991; 34: 403-13.
16. Sevin B-U, Lu Y, Bloch D, Nadji M, Koechil O, Averette H. Surgically defined prognostic parameters in early cervical carcinoma: a tree structured survival analysis. Cancer 1996; 1438-46.
17. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. In: Wadsworth Statistics/Probability Series. Wadsworth & Brooks Cole, Monterey, CA, 1984.
18. nd Ed. Springer, New York, 1994.
19. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Carey MA, Johnston CC Jr. Choosing between predictors of fractures. J Bone Mineral Res 1995; 10: 1816-22.
20. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, Imose K, Yates J, Vogel J, Wasnich R. Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone 1995; 16: 325-32.