The acceptability of different routes of administration of analgesia for breakthrough pain

Palliative Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 219-221

  Walker, G ^a   Wilcock, Andrew ^a   Manderson, C ^a   Weller, R ^a   Crosby, V ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; FENTANYL;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CANCER PAIN; CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEAR; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; OUTPATIENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRESCRIPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE AVERSION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALGESICS; DATA COLLECTION; DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0037247824     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269216303pm755oa     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Wilcock A. New approaches to pain management. Prog palliat care 2001; 9: 100-101
2. Lockey AS. Patient preference for route of diclofenac. Injury 1998; 29: 99-100
3. Carroll M, Day F, Hennessy A, Buggy D, Cooney C. Patient attitudes to perioperative suppository administration for postoperative analgesia. Ir J Med Sci 1996; 165: 286-88
4. Cooper IM. Morphine for postoperative analgesia. A comparison of intramuscular and subcutaneous routes of administration. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24: 574-78