A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema

Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-16

  Yang, Yunsik ^b   Vitale, Susan ^b   Ding, Yulan ^b   O'Connell, Stephen R ^b   Alexander, Judith ^b   Bressler, Neil M ^b   Schachat, Andrew P ^b   Zeimer, Ran ^a  

^a Talia Technologies Ltd   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; EVALUATION; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETINA; RETINA MACULA EDEMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; THICKNESS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEREORADIOGRAPHY;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; MACULAR EDEMA, CYSTOID; ODDS RATIO; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0037246369     PISSN: 10823069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sander B, Larsen M, Moldow B, Lund-Andersen H. Diabetic macular edema: passive and active transport of fluorescein through the blood-retina barrier. Invest Ophthamol Vis Sci. 2001;42:433-438.
2. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy, IV: diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1464-1474.
3. Vitale S, Maguire MG, Murphy RP, et al. Clinically significant macular edema in type I diabetes. Incidence and risk factors. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1170-1176.
4. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report No. 9. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:766-785.
5. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema. Relationship of treatment effect to fluorescein angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline. ETDRS report number 19. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1144-1155.
6. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796-1806.
7. Shahidi M, Ogura Y, Blair NP, Rusin MM, Zeimer R. Retinal thickness analysis for quantitative assessment of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1991;109:1115-1119.
8. Nussenblatt RB, Kaufman SC, Palestine AG, Davis MD, Ferris FL III. Macular thickening and visual acuity. Measurement in patients with cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1134-1139.
9. Smith RT, Lee CM, Charles HC, Farber M, Cunha-Vaz JG. Quantification of diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:218-222.
10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786-806.
11. Kinyoun J, Barton F, Fisher M, Hubbard L, Aiello L, Ferris R III. Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 5. The ETDRS Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:746-750.
12. Klein R. Discussion of Kinyoun et al: detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography. ETDRS report number 5. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:750-751.
13. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL, the Inoveon Health Research Group. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy. Accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:595-601.
14. Singer DE, Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Schachat AP. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:660-671.
15. Lee P. Telemedicine: opportunities and challenges for the remote care of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1639-1640. Editorial.
16. Hee MR, Puliafito C, Wong D, et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1019-1029.
17. Strom C, Sander B, Larsen N, Larsen M, Lund-Andersen H. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:241-245.
18. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Goldberg MF, Zou S. Application of rapid scanning retinal thickness analysis in retinal disease. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1145-1151.
19. Yang YS, Zou S, Zeimer R, Bressler NM, Schachat AP, Finkelstein D. Quantitative mapping of the retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with clinically significant macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38 (suppl):S342.
20. Nishiwaki H, Shahidi M, Vitale S, et al. Relation between retinal thickening and clinically visible fundus pathologies in mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33:127-134.
21. Zeimer R, Shahidi M, Mori M, Zou S, Asrani S. A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1994-2001.
22. Shahidi M, Zeimer RC, Mori MT. Noninvasive measurement of the retinal thickness. In: Wampler JE, ed. New Methods in Microscopy and Low Light Imaging. Bellingham, Wash: Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers; 1989:345-349.
23. Asrani S, Zou S, D'Anna S, Vitale S, Zeimer R. Noninvasive mapping of the normal retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:269-273.
24. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Moregenstern H. Epidemiologic Research. Principles and Quantitative Methods. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1982.
25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 6. 3rd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1990.
26. Cressie NAC. Statistics for Spatial Data. Rev ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1993.
27. Kiri A, Dyer DS, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Schachat AP. Detection of diabetic macular edema: Nidek 3Dx stereophotography compared with fundus biomicroscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:654-662.
28. Vallortigara G, Bressan P. Occlusion, transparency, and stereopsis: a new explanation for stereo capture. Vision Res. 1994;34:2891-2896.